this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2022
0 points (NaN% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15881 readers
548 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to [email protected]

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“This book had WAY too much of an obvious agenda for me and I’m a leftist!” :fedposting:

Nah let’s be real they’re probably just a shitlib who thinks putting BLM in their bio and supporting Warren makes them a leftist

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Settlers is amazing, the central thesis is instrumental in explaining the apparent contradictions of the political views of the white working class in the United States. Liberals falsely conclude that the white worker must simply be too dumb to support their corporate technocracy even if their policies are technically better. This misattribution of cause stems from the intrinisic lack of systemic and material analysis in liberalism. The second you consider that the United States enjoys the wealth of a global empire and that on a global scale the white worker in the US is much closer to being bourgeois than proletarian, everything snaps into sharp focus. Suddenly you understand why reactionary policies are popular where tolerance and gestures at welfare programs aren't: because the material conditions of even the most exploited worker in the US is far high than on the periphery of empire. I'm typing this on a machine made in minerals extracted by children, this coffee I'm addicted to was likely farmed by slaves. No wonder we aren't doing a revolution no matter how bad our material conditions get, the baseline of our material reality is too good and is inherently not as horrible as in the countries this empire exploits. So yeah read Settlers

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

because the material conditions of even the most exploited worker in the US is far high than on the periphery of empire

of the most exploited white worker*

https://imageio.forbes.com/blogs-images/timworstall/files/2015/10/creditsuisseweatlhreport.jpg?format=jpg&width=960

That tail end of the America curve is disproportionately Black/Latino

Also shows that there are no desperately poor people in China. They virtually don't exist. :xi-shining: