Testing to see if clients render jpegxl images properly
this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024
1 points (66.7% liked)
test
871 readers
7 users here now
For when you need to see what happens.
You can help us test patch releases at https://enterprise.lemmy.ml
Also there are two more testing instances:
https://voyager.lemmy.ml
https://ds9.lemmy.ml/
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Boost does not render the image. Can't even display the image when clicking on it as Boost's integrated webbrowser just tries to download it instead. Also, HTTP warning.
I added https, so no warnings should appear anymore
Thank you. The warning is gone, though the result remains the same. Sadly.
The http warning is because an https site contains http content because I didn't bother setting up https on my cdn. Looks like only Firefox nightly can barely render jpeg xl images.
Maybe fix the http issue? As that may skew your results with clients refusing to even download the image.
Jerboa thinks it's a link and doesn't show an image. You can open it in the browser, but none of the browsers on my phone know what to do with it and just dump it in the downloads folder.
I'm working on the http issue. The behaviour where it downloads the file instead of viewing the image is because the browser/client doesn't even know that the image is an image. It thinks it's a file and so it downloads it. I thought jpeg xl would be supported by now, but it seems like clients don't know what to do with the format.
I figured that was the case, just wanted to point it out. :)