this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
306 points (96.4% liked)

[Dormant] moved to !space@mander.xyz

10397 readers
1 users here now

This community is dormant, please find us at !space@mander.xyz

You can find the original sidebar contents below:

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Picture of the Day

The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula

Related Communities

๐Ÿ”ญ Science

๐Ÿš€ Engineering

๐ŸŒŒ Art and Photography

Other Cool Links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Bitswap@lemmy.world
Agamemnon@lemmy.world
L7ePvmEn@lemmy.world
otter@lemmy.world
306
SpaceX repeatedly polluted waters in Texas this year, regulators found (www.cnbc.com)
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by Wilshire@lemmy.world to c/space@lemmy.world
20 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Needs confirmation

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

0.133ug/l is the detection limit of the test

the rapport is saying is that there is no detectable mercury

SpaceX have since published a second statement confirming that there was a typo in the report, and stating that the mercury concentration is below detectable levels in most cases: https://x.com/SpaceX/status/1823378186836889699

Expand for tweet contents:

CNBC updated its story yesterday with additional factually inaccurate information.

While there may be a typo in one table of the initial TCEQ's public version of the permit application, the rest of the application and the lab reports clearly states that levels of Mercury found in non-stormwater discharge associated with the water deluge system are well below state and federal water quality criteria (of no higher than 2.1 micrograms per liter for acute aquatic toxicity), and are, in most instances, non-detectable.

The initial application was updated within 30 days to correct the typo and TCEQ is updating the application to reflect the correction.

So, pretty much what you surmised.