Legal News

218 readers

57 users here now

International and local legal news.

Basic rules

1. English only

Title and associated content has to be in English.

2. Sensitive topics need NSFW flag

Some cases involve sensitive topics. Use common sense and if you think that the content might trigger someone, post it under NSFW flag.

3. Instance rules apply

All lemmy.zip instance rules listed in the sidebar will be enforced.

Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 6 months ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

RFK Jr’s anti-vaccine group can’t sue Meta for agreeing with CDC, judge rules (arstechnica.com)

submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Meta can censor “distasteful” anti-vaccine views, appeals court rules.

Case file: https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Childrens-Health-Defense-v-Meta-Opinion-8-9-2024.pdf

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago (2 children)

You know you're a fuck head when you got me agreeing with Meta....

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No shit, right? I hope the judge ruled this with prejudice, pissed off from the audacity that a lawyer would even try this nonsense in a courtroom. If I were that judge, I would have sanctioned those prosecutors and advised the bar to retest their qualifications.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

On June 29, 2021, the district court dismissed the operative complaint, and the court entered final judgment the next day. The district court dismissed Science Feedback without prejudice for lack of service, and it dismissed the remaining Defendants with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

Quick search for "with prejudice" in the document. I guess they tried to argue that Meta was acting on behalf of the state when they "censored" their anti vaccine posts, but they failed spectacularly in doing so.