you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Do you think high skill trades aren't an education? I don't think they are saying anything against a traditional university education, but more supporting skilled trades as well.


    My mistake, they did say "instead of free college". I think we could probably support both if we raised the standards a bit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Well we spent 30 years valuing college... How did that work out?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Anyone who had a social security and blood pulse could go to college and that's what happened.

    1/3 failed out,1/3 doing jobs which don't require a college degree.

    1/3 benefited to varying degree.

    Do you think we needed note millennials in college.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I am not a conservative wtf... my body of work speaks for itself. What are you basing this clown take on?

    they don’t speak to the qualitative benefit of educating a population.

    This is benefit in the room with us right now?

    All I see is increasingly improvised and indebted population, working longer hours, getting less benefits... people are not forming families. People can't afford rent.

    Now show me this benefit you are talking about, dear!

    What is the qualitative risk of an educated population?

    Debt slavery which solid part of millennials is currently suffering.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] [S] -2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    , but since we have made it available to anyone with a pulse

    Who is this "we"? Are you owner of a company? Because I am not, I made not such decisions. Did you you?

    Employers start pushing for this shit starting 40 years ago and people respond as manufacturing jobs go eroded. so THEY made it a requirement for secretary needing an English major... trying getting that job with out a BA lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    If we’re talking about altering society on a mass scale, you’re damned right I care about measurable outcomes.

    I value freedom. I value economic consent. If you’re going to use centralized power to forcibly trade me something else for a loss of those two, the the other thing needs to be measurable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)
  • [+] [S] -2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    The problem is that there are not enough well paying jobs to support this "educated" population esp with a ton of debt.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    China created a booming solar industry by subsidizing it heavily. We can do that too with other industries, and the subsidy can come in the form of trades education.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    Obama subsidized solar too... What do we have to show for it?

    Again, why should impoverished taxpayer subsidize the capex of property owner? In free entperise and private capitalist society why is we paying here?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    No, we poured tons of government money into making college accessible. I went to college on loans designed for that purpose.

    We valued college and we backed the notion with hard cash. Well, with forced loans.

    It drove the price of college through the roof though. Just like housing, just like medicine, just like all the other things we provide government money to help people get.

    It’s a consistent pattern. People don’t trust the free market, something is deemed too important to let the market handle, so we pump government money into purchasing assistance and, predictably to anyone who’s taken macroeconomics 101, the prices of those things skyrocket and the availability drops.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments