the_dunk_tank
It's the dunk tank.
This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to [email protected]
Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again
view the rest of the comments
What did he mean by rigged? Was it that people didn't actually vote for maduro or was it just that maduro had an advantage?
If anything, the opposition had a wild advantage with all the private media being behind them
I could probably rewatch it, and perhaps he wrote more on Twitter/his YT channel little blog area (whatever it's called), but his evidence seemed to be, imo, circumstantial. Sort of like "normally this thing happens" (release of results and a tracking of how votes happened to my understanding) "it did not happen this time. That is weird and suspicious. Combined with Madura's failures (in BE's opinion: I really don't know enough to hold much opinion), it seems likely he would lose and the hiding of the results suggests wrongdoing."
He also mentioned some state suppression "worse than" the disappearances under the Argentinian dictatorship. That doesn't seem like a statement he would make lightly based on his past videos/comments regarding the right wing crimes in Argentina.
So, if he's exaggerating or just lying... it'll be disappointing. I know people hate his abrasive personality (sort of by design by him to keep people away), but I do find his mainline videos interesting. Mostly just historical stuff about places I haven't read much about or debunking some popular liberal stuff.