▲ 1021 ▼ Google Chrome warns uBlock Origin may soon be disabled (www.bleepingcomputer.com) submitted 2 years ago by neme@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world 437 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] TheTimeKnife@lemmy.world 130 points 2 years ago (3 children) Google needs to be broken up by government. permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] ArugulaZ@lemmy.zip 63 points 2 years ago (2 children) It saddens me to agree with this. Who knew Google would become as oppressive as fucking MICROSOFT? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] tahoe@lemmy.world 47 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) « Don’t be evil » 😬😬😬😬 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zacryon@feddit.org 19 points 2 years ago They ditched that in 2018. It was long overdue. At least somewhat honest about themselves. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago Most smart people who understood capitalism did. permalink fedilink source parent [–] voluble@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (2 children) I hear the term 'broken up' a lot in media and discourse, but it's never explained. In your eyes, what actually happens when a government 'breaks up' a corporation? I mean, what are the steps, objectives, and outcomes? Not being adversarial, I'm just curious. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] boatswain@infosec.pub 3 points 2 years ago Not the person you're asking, but my general understanding is that different products would be required to be their own companies, so advertising, Android, and Chrome would all be separate businesses. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Verat@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago* I envision it like AT&T's break-up, where the singular Google is broken up into regional companies that will (hopefully) have to compete with each other. permalink fedilink source parent [–] NekkoDroid@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) It really wouldn't change anything in the long run. Any company that creates a browser is gonna need some form of income and people aren't willing to pay for a browser. What would be their incentive to continue to work on the browser when they aren't being paid? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Same as Firefox. Let search engines (including google) pay them a fair market rate to make them the default browser. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ArugulaZ@lemmy.zip 63 points 2 years ago (2 children) It saddens me to agree with this. Who knew Google would become as oppressive as fucking MICROSOFT? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] tahoe@lemmy.world 47 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) « Don’t be evil » 😬😬😬😬 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zacryon@feddit.org 19 points 2 years ago They ditched that in 2018. It was long overdue. At least somewhat honest about themselves. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago Most smart people who understood capitalism did. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tahoe@lemmy.world 47 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) « Don’t be evil » 😬😬😬😬 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zacryon@feddit.org 19 points 2 years ago They ditched that in 2018. It was long overdue. At least somewhat honest about themselves. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 19 points 2 years ago They ditched that in 2018. It was long overdue. At least somewhat honest about themselves. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago Most smart people who understood capitalism did. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] voluble@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (2 children) I hear the term 'broken up' a lot in media and discourse, but it's never explained. In your eyes, what actually happens when a government 'breaks up' a corporation? I mean, what are the steps, objectives, and outcomes? Not being adversarial, I'm just curious. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] boatswain@infosec.pub 3 points 2 years ago Not the person you're asking, but my general understanding is that different products would be required to be their own companies, so advertising, Android, and Chrome would all be separate businesses. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Verat@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago* I envision it like AT&T's break-up, where the singular Google is broken up into regional companies that will (hopefully) have to compete with each other. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] boatswain@infosec.pub 3 points 2 years ago Not the person you're asking, but my general understanding is that different products would be required to be their own companies, so advertising, Android, and Chrome would all be separate businesses. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Verat@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago* I envision it like AT&T's break-up, where the singular Google is broken up into regional companies that will (hopefully) have to compete with each other. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NekkoDroid@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) It really wouldn't change anything in the long run. Any company that creates a browser is gonna need some form of income and people aren't willing to pay for a browser. What would be their incentive to continue to work on the browser when they aren't being paid? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Same as Firefox. Let search engines (including google) pay them a fair market rate to make them the default browser. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Same as Firefox. Let search engines (including google) pay them a fair market rate to make them the default browser. permalink fedilink source parent