this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
147 points (96.2% liked)

Asklemmy

44152 readers
1066 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago (2 children)
[โ€“] [email protected] 31 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Nope, copyrights isn't the issue, they enable people to earn money from their creativity, the issue is rather that they are way too long.

Back in the 1780s copyright lasted 14 years after the work was created.

This is fine, the current obscene legnth of copyright is terrible.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

I'd be fine with copyright being like 20 years or so, that's plenty of time to make a good amount of money from your work IMO. But yeah the current system where some corporation gets to keep cashing in on something half a century after the author is dead is pretty ridiculous.

[โ€“] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

people have always been able to earn money from their creativity. copyright is just corporate greed.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Copyright provides the legal framework to ensure the copyright holder has their rights protected.

[โ€“] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Technically every right and every prohibition is fictional...

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

oh shit. now you're on my level

[โ€“] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago (2 children)

We only really run into trouble when we start treating corporations like people and copyright as a commodity in it's own right.

Non-transferable copyright for the life of the author would be perfectly acceptable.

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

the statute of Anne was the first copyright law and it was written to stop printers in London from breaking each others' knees over who was allowed to print the world of Shakespeare who was already long dead.

copyright is a bill of goods when packaged as a protection for creatives.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Not for something like medicine or crops that people will die if the copyright holder abuses their copyright. In that case we have to act for the greater good and make medicine first, compensate creators later, if at all.