this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2024
231 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

59197 readers
3139 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 98 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I swear the only legitimate response to a corporation saying "I'm going to self regulate"

Is:

"HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Ok anyway, here are the regulations we're going to enforce."

[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 months ago

That fact that is not taken as a given, speaks a lot about how deeply ingrained corruption is in our society.

I would almost argue that even "neutral" newswires like AP/Reuters should use language like "Companies A, B, C, have created a common PR organisation that will be focused on self-regulation polemics ...".

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

yeah how is this even allowed, promise or no promise? why can't individuals do this? "hey, no need to write any laws on poisoning your boss, promise i will self-regulate."

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Any entity or group that can be trusted to self-regulate wouldn't raise the question about whether they need to be regulated in the first place.