this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2024
100 points (89.1% liked)

Technology

58133 readers
4481 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
100
To what extent, if at all, would have CrowdStrike's faulty update have been easier to deal with with an immutable distro? (lemmy.ml)
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
51 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

Aren't most immutable Linux distros AB, almost by definition? If it's immutable, you can't update the system because it's immutable. If you make it mutable for updates, it's no longer immutable.

The process should be:

  1. Boot from A
  2. Install new version to B
  3. Reboot into B
  4. If unstable, go to 1
  5. If stable, repeat from 1, but with A and B swapped

That's how immutable systems work. The main alternative is a PXE system, and in that case you fix the image in one place and power cycle all your machines.

If you're mounting your immutable system as mutable for updates, congratulations, you have the worst of immutable and mutable systems and you deserve everything bad that happens because of it.