Privacy

31886 readers

472 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

[Matrix/Element]Dead
Discord

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Can a website access my local network/learn about the existence of other devices without installing malware? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

30 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Basically title. Recently I saw a new option in Chromium website permission settings called "allow access to local network" or something like that and I know some antiviruses on Windows that can list all devices connected to the same WiFi network. I'm usually using Firefox based browsers that obviously don't have the option to disable or enable that access. So can some really invasive websites mine data about my local network, connected devices etc? And if so, what can I do to prevent it except for just disconnecting everything else when visiting such websites?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah my main browser is easily fingerprinted due to the many ways it is non-standard. I'll use torbrowser or something if it actually matters. But JShelter does not really make that problem worse for most people, and it probably frustrates some fraction of attempts — including those that rely on web workers apparently.

The page load time of creepjs would not be acceptable for use in real life. Anything with that much creepy js is going to get itself blocked by other means.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The page load time of creepjs would not be acceptable for use in real life

Well any site that uses fingerprinting tech, regardless of what it is, is just going to have it load silently in the background so I don't think it would be noticeable anyways.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

That depends on what's making it take so long, among other things. But with sufficient effort I suppose the more sneaky fingerprinters (those which aren't aren't already blocked by other extensions) could probably be made difficult to notice for unprepared users. JShelter popping up a big warning about a "very high" level of fingerprinting activity is a pretty good hint though, and I take it as a suggestion to add some rules for ublock if I expect to visit that site again.

As it continues to get more common, maybe it's time to go back to using noscript as well.