▲ 469 ▼ Steam Is Run By Fewer Than 80 Staff, Lawsuit Docs Reveal (insider-gaming.com) submitted 2 years ago by simple@lemm.ee to c/games@lemmy.world 236 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Corigan@lemm.ee 130 points 2 years ago (4 children) Who the fuck cares what's with this constant desire to try and shit on steam permalink fedilink source hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 101 points 2 years ago (1 child) Because they tried competing and it didn't work because they kept offering an inferior product, so they're trying to weasel Steam out of the market permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] homicidalrobot@lemm.ee 46 points 2 years ago (1 child) As for as storefronts go, which is what's being talked about here, they are competing and winning. With a fraction of the employees other companies employ for storefront work. Origin (Rest Unpeacefully) and Uplay never stood a chance and epic has had plenty of time to market saturate. The company not being publicly traded doesn't prevent competition, it prevents investor interests like quashing competition. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 42 points 2 years ago They meant the other companies tried competing and failed so they're pushing these anti-valve lawsuits and articles. permalink fedilink source parent [–] lanolinoil@lemmy.world 44 points 2 years ago (2 children) Shit on? This is some baller ass shit -- What is the rev per employee a billion dollars?!?!?! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 35 points 2 years ago* (1 child) They've touted before that they may be the most profitable company per employee on earth. They make a few billion in profit per year with a payroll of a few hundred employees. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lanolinoil@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago Must be -- I can't think of anyone else that could come close unless you count Berkshire Hathaway or something permalink fedilink source parent [–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) I don't know, there's plenty of anti-Valve rhetoric on Lemmy. Plenty of people try to spin it as Valve having a low employee count because they have a lot of contractors. One guy was making a point that Valve employee count is much lower because they buy in AMD GPUs for the Steam Deck... As if Valve should buy chip manufacturing plants and design and manufacture their own GPUs. Even here somewhere below (or maybe up later) in this thread someone said Also, a company can pretend to have 10 employees if it instead hires 1000 contractors to do the actual work. Which is an argument, if you can prove Valve is buying in 10 times the amount of contractors as they have employees for positions that should go to full-time employees. But I very much doubt such information exists. permalink fedilink source parent [–] synae@lemmy.sdf.org 36 points 2 years ago (2 children) How is this even shitting on them? It's impressive af permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Corigan@lemm.ee 19 points 2 years ago Just more seems to be a lot of posts on this topic and they are filled with anti steam crap permalink fedilink source parent [–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 years ago (2 children) The way the headline is phrased suggests a disapproving tone. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Pregnenolone@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) How so? It’s about as neutral as can be. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Anything not directly biased towards my interests are against my interests. ;p permalink fedilink source parent [–] HKayn@dormi.zone 0 points 2 years ago Explain. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ripcord@lemmy.world 35 points 2 years ago I definitely didn't interpret this as shitting on Steam. In fact, the opposite. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 101 points 2 years ago (1 child) Because they tried competing and it didn't work because they kept offering an inferior product, so they're trying to weasel Steam out of the market permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] homicidalrobot@lemm.ee 46 points 2 years ago (1 child) As for as storefronts go, which is what's being talked about here, they are competing and winning. With a fraction of the employees other companies employ for storefront work. Origin (Rest Unpeacefully) and Uplay never stood a chance and epic has had plenty of time to market saturate. The company not being publicly traded doesn't prevent competition, it prevents investor interests like quashing competition. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 42 points 2 years ago They meant the other companies tried competing and failed so they're pushing these anti-valve lawsuits and articles. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] homicidalrobot@lemm.ee 46 points 2 years ago (1 child) As for as storefronts go, which is what's being talked about here, they are competing and winning. With a fraction of the employees other companies employ for storefront work. Origin (Rest Unpeacefully) and Uplay never stood a chance and epic has had plenty of time to market saturate. The company not being publicly traded doesn't prevent competition, it prevents investor interests like quashing competition. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 42 points 2 years ago They meant the other companies tried competing and failed so they're pushing these anti-valve lawsuits and articles. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 42 points 2 years ago They meant the other companies tried competing and failed so they're pushing these anti-valve lawsuits and articles. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lanolinoil@lemmy.world 44 points 2 years ago (2 children) Shit on? This is some baller ass shit -- What is the rev per employee a billion dollars?!?!?! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 35 points 2 years ago* (1 child) They've touted before that they may be the most profitable company per employee on earth. They make a few billion in profit per year with a payroll of a few hundred employees. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lanolinoil@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago Must be -- I can't think of anyone else that could come close unless you count Berkshire Hathaway or something permalink fedilink source parent [–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) I don't know, there's plenty of anti-Valve rhetoric on Lemmy. Plenty of people try to spin it as Valve having a low employee count because they have a lot of contractors. One guy was making a point that Valve employee count is much lower because they buy in AMD GPUs for the Steam Deck... As if Valve should buy chip manufacturing plants and design and manufacture their own GPUs. Even here somewhere below (or maybe up later) in this thread someone said Also, a company can pretend to have 10 employees if it instead hires 1000 contractors to do the actual work. Which is an argument, if you can prove Valve is buying in 10 times the amount of contractors as they have employees for positions that should go to full-time employees. But I very much doubt such information exists. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 35 points 2 years ago* (1 child) They've touted before that they may be the most profitable company per employee on earth. They make a few billion in profit per year with a payroll of a few hundred employees. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lanolinoil@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago Must be -- I can't think of anyone else that could come close unless you count Berkshire Hathaway or something permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lanolinoil@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago Must be -- I can't think of anyone else that could come close unless you count Berkshire Hathaway or something permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) I don't know, there's plenty of anti-Valve rhetoric on Lemmy. Plenty of people try to spin it as Valve having a low employee count because they have a lot of contractors. One guy was making a point that Valve employee count is much lower because they buy in AMD GPUs for the Steam Deck... As if Valve should buy chip manufacturing plants and design and manufacture their own GPUs. Even here somewhere below (or maybe up later) in this thread someone said Also, a company can pretend to have 10 employees if it instead hires 1000 contractors to do the actual work. Which is an argument, if you can prove Valve is buying in 10 times the amount of contractors as they have employees for positions that should go to full-time employees. But I very much doubt such information exists. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] synae@lemmy.sdf.org 36 points 2 years ago (2 children) How is this even shitting on them? It's impressive af permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Corigan@lemm.ee 19 points 2 years ago Just more seems to be a lot of posts on this topic and they are filled with anti steam crap permalink fedilink source parent [–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 years ago (2 children) The way the headline is phrased suggests a disapproving tone. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Pregnenolone@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) How so? It’s about as neutral as can be. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Anything not directly biased towards my interests are against my interests. ;p permalink fedilink source parent [–] HKayn@dormi.zone 0 points 2 years ago Explain. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Corigan@lemm.ee 19 points 2 years ago Just more seems to be a lot of posts on this topic and they are filled with anti steam crap permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 years ago (2 children) The way the headline is phrased suggests a disapproving tone. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Pregnenolone@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) How so? It’s about as neutral as can be. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Anything not directly biased towards my interests are against my interests. ;p permalink fedilink source parent [–] HKayn@dormi.zone 0 points 2 years ago Explain. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Pregnenolone@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) How so? It’s about as neutral as can be. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Anything not directly biased towards my interests are against my interests. ;p permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Anything not directly biased towards my interests are against my interests. ;p permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 35 points 2 years ago I definitely didn't interpret this as shitting on Steam. In fact, the opposite. permalink fedilink source parent