Any recommendation on antivirus that isn't annoying and don't give false positive on cracks? (lemmy.dbzer0.com)

submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

43 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Most antivirus I tested, even the paid ones, are so annoying with popups and complaining about cracks that I just take the risk and go without em

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] [email protected] 20 points 10 months ago

How do you know they're false positives?

[-] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Windows defender claimed they're bad because they are cracks, and doesn't mention any reason it thinks that would be a virus/trojan or something I dont want

"HackTool:Win32/crack" from games downloaded on fitgirl repacks site (the correct one)

[-] [email protected] 24 points 10 months ago

Isn't that a matter of behavior? The crack is doing something expected from a crack and the system warns you because most wouldn't use it without being aware. If you really trust the file, add it as an exception.

Or do you want a software that can vet good cracks from bad cracks?

[-] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

I think the point is that it's a bit silly to classify cracks as malware

[-] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago

Enterprise antivirus products have had PUP (Potentially Unwanted Program) category forever. Seems its categorized as "HackTool" so not malware.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago

Cracks modify executables...classic malware/virus behaviour. Almost the definition of malware.

Which is why windows uses a file protection system since at least XP

[-] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

Not at all, a crack does something to an executable file that you use. Malware would do the exact same thing.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

But you generally want that crack to do something to an executable. Do antivirus etc. tools just heuristically flag everything that looks like it modifies an executable? Lots of legitimate dev tools do that too, so it seems like it'd give a lot of false positives, but I haven't used Windows in ages so 🤷

[-] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

Well, how is the system supposed to know that you want the crack to do something to that executable? The anti virus just sees something is happening and flags it. It does not see a difference.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

I definitely get what you mean, I just have no idea if antivirus tools flag anything that looks like it modifies executables. My edit to the comment you're replying to may not have propagated to your instance yet, so here's what I added:

Do antivirus etc. tools just heuristically flag everything that looks like it modifies an executable? Lots of legitimate dev tools do that too, so it seems like it'd give a lot of false positives, but I haven't used Windows in ages so 🤷