you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 33 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 22 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    I mean, it kind of does mean something small, which is credibility. Karma wasn’t ever a flawless way to determine credibility, but it was a decent first pass, like an online ocular patdown.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Uh, no. Lol

    It maybe showed popularity. But it was frequently manipulated.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 years ago

    Example: replace this entire comment with a portion of a highly upvoted comment below from this same thread, combine that with an official experience that only shows one or two top level comments and those copies can also get lots of upvotes. Reddit was rife with these kinds of bots.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Bro I've never for a second thought that gallowboob had any credibility whatsoever and the motherfucker had like, all the KARMA

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    You’re completely missing my point. I’m not saying you should worship the guy, but he has more credibility than a troll with negative karma or a 3 month old tshirt bot with a few hundred karma from plagiarized comments.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    Hi I'm necrocommenting this old comment, sorry.

    You're conflating post karma and comment karma. Post karma is shit and almost everyone on reddit with super high post karma is awful. Comment karma however is often a decent measure of credibility. The problem is people conflate the two, or worse, inappropriately value post karma over comment karma.

  • source
  • parent