Technology

58981 readers

4270 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

437

HP forced to ditch popular printer range following user backlash (www.techradar.com)

submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

63 comments fedilink hide all child comments

HP has discontinued its e-series LaserJet printers following widespread consumer dissatisfaction with the printers’ mandatory online connection of the HP+ scheme.

The decision, reported by German media outlet §, addresses growing frustration among users who have been forced to maintain a constant internet connection and use HP original ink and toner, with cheaper and more accessible third-party alternatives prohibited.

The LaserJet e-series models, identifiable by an ‘e’ suffix in their models names, now look to have been pulled from sale.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Firmware update, means the printers keep working with third party ink (HP loses). Bricking them, means you must buy another printer (HP has a 50:50 chance to win).

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I don't think that's how probability works.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It is how it works if you are told to make a PowerPoint for senior leadership on how to squeeze the most possible short term money out of this situation

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Yup. And 100% risk of loss is worse than even 99% risk of loss to a boardroom.