this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2024
510 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

59299 readers
4531 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
510
Sony is killing off recordable Blu-ray, bidding farewell to disc burning | TechSpot (www.techspot.com)
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
149 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Based on their 100T of data the .00099 per GB pricing will have them spending $99 a month, or $1200 a year, for backup.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You have to ask yourself if that’s worth it to you.

For me? Yeah, I don’t want to rebuild these datasets.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

After a few years, it'd probably be cheaper to get a second NAS and store it at a friend/relative's place.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

I have a few friends that do that too!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

Yup, that's why I don't bother backing up media to places like S3 or B2, I only back up important stuff like family pictures and tax documents. Replacing my DVD or Bluray collection is feasible, it just costs time and money, but I can't replace pictures and whatnot.