this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2024
75 points (98.7% liked)

Games

16679 readers
940 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago (4 children)

How about a quick summary. TL:DW?

[–] [email protected] 49 points 4 months ago (3 children)

In every case, Denuvo balloons the exe file size by 4-5x (we're talking 400-500 MB for a <100 MB game exe), can increase loading times between 10-400%, and in most cases, lowers framerates between 10-40%, and can introduce microstutters. There are a few outliers where Denuvo's removal coincides with worse framerates for some reason. But essentially, removing Denuvo speeds things up a lot, especially download size and loading times.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'll have to look later but it will be good to have sourceable evidence for this if it's true

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

I mean, I will. I literally said that.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)