this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2024
60 points (94.1% liked)

Australian News

551 readers
46 users here now

A place to share and discuss news relating to Australia and Australians.

Rules
  1. Follow the aussie.zone rules
  2. Keep discussions civil and respectful
  3. Exclude profanity from post titles
  4. Exclude excessive profanity from comments
  5. Satire is allowed, however post titles must be prefixed with [satire]
Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Banner: ABC

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
60
Picasso artworks put in female toilet as part of art gallery response to court ruling (www.abc.net.au)
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
26 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
  • In short: Tasmanian art gallery Mona has hung artworks by Pablo Picasso in a female toilet cubicle in response to a failed court bid to exclude men from a women-only art installation.
  • In April, a court ruling found Mona discriminated when it refused a New South Wales man entry to its Ladies Lounge.
  • What's next? Mona curator Kirsha Kaechele is appealing the discrimination ruling in the Supreme Court.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If you punish me for something I didn’t do. Then I’ll hate you. There’s nothing more to it.

If you lack the empathy to understand the bigger picture, that says more about you than it does them. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

If you wanna do “sexism against men because they are sexist towards women” you should at least do things that you suffer from. There are no men-only art galleries in Australia. How is this supposed to teach men “see how you feel? That’s how I feel every day”.

They aren't in a position to (for example) stop men from getting hired into executive positions, though. The lack of capacity for a discriminated minority to effectively retaliate in-kind is part of the point, is it not?

Moreover, what entitles you to decide for them what forms of protest are acceptable?

The fact that you managed to combine a "bootstraps" fallacy and "white moderate" paternalism (albeit applied to sexism instead of racism) so succinctly is honestly kinda impressive.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Well, if a company doesn't hire an executive because she is a woman, paint their parking lot. Don't need to make a company that hires no executive men.

Making a women-only art gallery accomplishes nothing.