this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024
28 points (96.7% liked)
SpaceX
1941 readers
28 users here now
A community for discussing SpaceX.
Related space communities:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
Memes:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Probably because Ariane 6 is a new rocket, and new rockets haven't had the bugs worked out and have a disproportionately high failure rate.
Good grief.
NASA flew the James Webb Space Telescope on Ariane 5 for exactly the same reason -- because it was an extremely-expensive payload, and when they expected to launch the thing, Falcon was immature, and Ariane 5 was mature. I didn't hear people running around saying that the US had "stabbed American rocketry in the back" by launching something on France's baby. Hell, we spent a long time launching stuff on Russian rockets, which I think probably has a lot more potential for controversy.
When you can get a mature and reliable rocket faster for less money, the value proposition for Ariane 6 starts looking pretty weak.
I think the value proposition is more about national pride and security, so they can keep launching things if they have a falling out with other countries. Like when Russia decided to start a war and take Oneweb satellites hostage. Imagine a world where the US elected a crazy nationalist who wanted out of NATO...
Absolutely, and for a national security type payload that's both a requirement and enough to make a decision.
That's a limited market though. I won't eat my hat, but I will be surprised if for example Viasat would choose to go on Ariane.