this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2024
818 points (95.2% liked)

Science Memes

11441 readers
950 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 76 points 6 months ago (65 children)

2/9 = 0.222... 7/9 = 0.777...

0.222... + 0.777... = 0.999... 2/9 + 7/9 = 1

0.999... = 1

No, it equals 1.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Similarly, 1/3 = 0.3333…
So 3 times 1/3 = 0.9999… but also 3/3 = 1

Another nice one:

Let x = 0.9999… (multiply both sides by 10)
10x = 9.99999… (substitute 0.9999… = x)
10x = 9 + x (subtract x from both sides)
9x = 9 (divide both sides by 9)
x = 1

[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 months ago (12 children)

My favorite thing about this argument is that not only are you right, but you can prove it with math.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That's the best explanation of this I've ever seen, thank you!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

That's more convoluted than the 1/3, 2/3, 3/3 thing.

3/3 = 0.99999...

3/3 = 1

If somebody still wants to argue after that, don't bother.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Nah that explanation is basically using an assumption to prove itself. You need to first prove that 1/3 does in fact equal .3333... which can be done using the 'convoluted' but not so convoluted proof

load more comments (63 replies)