▲ 272 ▼ Supreme Court issues token reasonable ruling (thebeaverton.com) submitted 2 years ago by ZeroCool@vger.social to c/theonion@midwest.social 18 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] yemmly@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (5 children) Old Supreme Court pic is old. permalink fedilink source hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] ZeroCool@vger.social [S] 20 points 2 years ago (3 children) Canadian satire site is Canadian. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] yemmly@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (2 children) Oh, and the use of an old pic that leaves out one of the justices they quote is a clever part of the satire and not just an oversight. Genius! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ZeroCool@vger.social [S] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) If that’s what I intended to say I would have. But I didn’t. I was simply mocking the utter inanity of your comment. We’re done here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] yemmly@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago Many thanks! Warm hugs! permalink fedilink source parent [–] FireTower@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago To be fair they're only one justice off. Jackson hasn't been on the bench for too long. It's not like they've got Scalia up there. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ZeroCool@vger.social [S] 20 points 2 years ago (3 children) Canadian satire site is Canadian. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] yemmly@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (2 children) Oh, and the use of an old pic that leaves out one of the justices they quote is a clever part of the satire and not just an oversight. Genius! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ZeroCool@vger.social [S] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) If that’s what I intended to say I would have. But I didn’t. I was simply mocking the utter inanity of your comment. We’re done here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] yemmly@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago Many thanks! Warm hugs! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] yemmly@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (2 children) Oh, and the use of an old pic that leaves out one of the justices they quote is a clever part of the satire and not just an oversight. Genius! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ZeroCool@vger.social [S] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) If that’s what I intended to say I would have. But I didn’t. I was simply mocking the utter inanity of your comment. We’re done here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] yemmly@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago Many thanks! Warm hugs! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ZeroCool@vger.social [S] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) If that’s what I intended to say I would have. But I didn’t. I was simply mocking the utter inanity of your comment. We’re done here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] yemmly@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago Many thanks! Warm hugs! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] yemmly@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago Many thanks! Warm hugs! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FireTower@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago To be fair they're only one justice off. Jackson hasn't been on the bench for too long. It's not like they've got Scalia up there. permalink fedilink source parent