196

16514 readers

2235 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

317

Rammenstein rule (lemmy.dbzer0.com)

submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

21 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Curious as to why?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

Just saw that you brought up the "charges were dropped" argument. That doesn't proof anything besides, well, a lack of evidence. And even if their actions aren't criminal here, they sure are morally questionable.

For me, the whole metoo movement around that topic made it very clear just how messed up that band really is (even thogh the music seemed great). The band didn't adress the drama in a nice way aswell, sending cease and desist letters to people telling their story (reference

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Yes, it doesn't prove anything. I never claimed it did. A lack of conviction is not proof of innocence, just as an accusation is not proof of guilt. Do with the information whatever you wish.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Do you think they're of the same weight?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

I think you're welcome to look at the available evidence and come to whatever conclusion you come to. I'm not telling you or anyone else how to feel about this.