this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2024
82 points (100.0% liked)

Funny

102 readers
2 users here now

Funniest content on all Lemmygrad

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Maybe the landlords should eat less avocado toast or something like that. Bootstraps…. idfk

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago (1 children)

A 3% rent increase on a $2600/month one bed one bath is $78/month, which over a 12 month lease is still an additional $936 for doing literally nothing. But all of this is irrelevant because $2600/month for an apartment was already way overpriced to begin with. L.A. county could force them to lower rents 3% and they’d still be making an obscene profit. And if these landlords sell, what are they going to do after that? Get real jobs? Not likely. It’s a total bluff. People choose to become landlords because they don’t want to work. Capping rent hikes at 3% would still allow them to not work, so they’re not going to suddenly sell of their assets and do something else. Also landlords (especially the big ones - companies such as Greystar/Cortland/Lincoln) invest with the ultimate goal of selling the buildings. That’s where the real money comes in. So they’re going to sell no matter what lukewarm rent regulations are put in place.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yep. This has signature California faux-populist policy written all over it. Capital still gets its firehose of rent for doing nothing with slightly improved market stability, and the people get good vibes while the machine grinds them into slurry.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

Also selling a house doesn't change its value, the new mortgage is going to be virtually the same as rent (banks issue mortgages in relation to expected rents), and will likely be turned around to rent anyway.