Paywall removed: https://archive.is/MbQYG

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 352 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (54 children)
  • [–] 61 points 2 years ago (41 children)

    SIKE! sold houses are only bought by corporate holding companies, now you've lost even more rights!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 41 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 2 years ago (21 children)

    In France there is a law that forces you to sell to your tenant if he has the highest bid

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Why would you need a law to make someone sell to the highest bidder?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    It's even better than that because it is illegal to make bids on a property you sell so the seller name a price and if someone want to buy it at that price it's sold. Most of the time buyers tries to bargain on markets where the demand is low

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    This happened a lot during the Great Depression. But then I believe the owners found a way to withdraw the auctioned property if the minimum bid didn't suit them. The French law might bring back the Penny Auction by saying, "You put it up for bid - a sale has to go through."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Wouldn't you sell to the highest bidder anyway?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I mean, my wife and I didn't sell to the two highest bidders on our first house because the fuckers were obviously going to rent it out.

    One was a bid entered by a piece of software often used by flippers and rental companies (had branding at the bottom of the pages etc) and the other was a cash in hand bid with an overt offer of more under the table, which is fairly illegal where we live.

    We selected third place, someone who had messy handwriting, obviously has been written by two different people, and ended the bid with "777" which was cute and showed us not only were they human, they really wanted the place. And no wonder, with offers like the first two likely happening on nearly every sale in the area.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    Wouldn’t most people sell to the highest bid anyway?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Never any history of racial segregation in the housing market, nope. No Sir. Never.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Are people really accepting less money so they don’t sell to brown people? Like why would you care? You’re selling the property. You don’t have to deal with the new owners if you happen to be racist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    Granted, this article was from all the way back in… last week.

    “An African-American woman’s quest to buy a pricey condo near the Virginia Beach Oceanfront – impeded by the white homeowner’s refusal because of her race – is just the latest example.”

    “…landlords frequently use subtle methods or mask the real reasons why they don’t want people to move in.”

    Virginia Mercury News

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago*

    The neighbors care. So unless you don't live in that town it could make for some interesting neighborly interactions. Wouldn't be surprised to find court cases of neighbors suing for loss of property value.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    There have been auctions in the past, mostly farm, that the community got together to drive off outsiders and then proceed to lowball every item on the auction. They would then return everything to the owner after the auction.

    It was a fine 'fuck you' to the bank, until the bank closed or sold out because they no longer had the assets and cash reserves needed to stay open themselves. Which then screwed the rest of the community over.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago*

    More precisely, when you sell the tenant has the right to buy it first.

    If the landlord is thinking of accepting an external offer under the initial price then he has to ask again to the tenant if he would buy it at this lower price.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (11 replies)