▲ 440 ▼ Intel’s Anti-Upgrade Tricks Defeated With Kapton Tape (hackaday.com) submitted 2 years ago by Wilshire@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 48 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] bappity@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago* (13 children) me when capitalism permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [+] umbrella@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] bruhduh@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (4 children) We have open source designs (RISCV also have GPU designs) but we don't have manufacture power open sourced yet permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Are there any projects to develop that capability that you know of? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bruhduh@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago No, there isn't yet, there's the most i could find, but it's not machines permalink fedilink source parent [+] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bruhduh@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Yes, i hope so too, as for now, semiconductor lithography at home is impossible due how big and complex these machines are, so i have same opinion as you are permalink fedilink source parent [–] tal@lemmy.today 2 points 2 years ago (6 children) https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/DOC_0000498114.pdf Soviet Computer Technology: Little Prospect for Catching Up We believe that there are many reasons why the Soviets trail the United States in computer technology: The Soviets' centrally-planned economy does not permit adequate flexibility to design or manufacturing changes frequently encountered in computer production; this situation has often resulted in a shortage of critical components especially for new products. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago* (1 child) If you're only response to criticism of capitalism is ((communism)), you may just be a cog in the corporate propaganda machine. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago I mean they went with a literal cia link. permalink fedilink source parent [–] GeneralVincent@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (3 children) Thanks for the link to the unbiased study by... the CIA? Huh. Yeah I trust them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] olympicyes@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) The paper was from 1985. Was the CIA correct? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Marginally. The paper analyzes the capabilities as they existed in the 1980s, but doesn't draw strong conclusions as to why that may be. It does demonstrate how reliance on central planning results in inadequaciea when said central planning is not operating well, though. The paper doesn't really mention it but the central planning of the USSR was actively reeling from Brezhnev dying, Andropov dying, and Chernenko either dying or about to die at the time the CIA thing was written. So yeah, correct is an accurate if imprecise way to put it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Yeah it’s more a criticism of the ussr in the 80s. Central planning with more tech focus and more democracy would likely not face that specific issue. But also there’s room for shit like kanban communism which definitely wouldn’t have these problems permalink fedilink source parent
[+] umbrella@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] bruhduh@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (4 children) We have open source designs (RISCV also have GPU designs) but we don't have manufacture power open sourced yet permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Are there any projects to develop that capability that you know of? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bruhduh@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago No, there isn't yet, there's the most i could find, but it's not machines permalink fedilink source parent [+] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bruhduh@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Yes, i hope so too, as for now, semiconductor lithography at home is impossible due how big and complex these machines are, so i have same opinion as you are permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bruhduh@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (4 children) We have open source designs (RISCV also have GPU designs) but we don't have manufacture power open sourced yet permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Are there any projects to develop that capability that you know of? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bruhduh@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago No, there isn't yet, there's the most i could find, but it's not machines permalink fedilink source parent [+] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bruhduh@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Yes, i hope so too, as for now, semiconductor lithography at home is impossible due how big and complex these machines are, so i have same opinion as you are permalink fedilink source parent
[–] zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Are there any projects to develop that capability that you know of? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bruhduh@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago No, there isn't yet, there's the most i could find, but it's not machines permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bruhduh@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago No, there isn't yet, there's the most i could find, but it's not machines permalink fedilink source parent
[+] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bruhduh@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Yes, i hope so too, as for now, semiconductor lithography at home is impossible due how big and complex these machines are, so i have same opinion as you are permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bruhduh@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Yes, i hope so too, as for now, semiconductor lithography at home is impossible due how big and complex these machines are, so i have same opinion as you are permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tal@lemmy.today 2 points 2 years ago (6 children) https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/DOC_0000498114.pdf Soviet Computer Technology: Little Prospect for Catching Up We believe that there are many reasons why the Soviets trail the United States in computer technology: The Soviets' centrally-planned economy does not permit adequate flexibility to design or manufacturing changes frequently encountered in computer production; this situation has often resulted in a shortage of critical components especially for new products. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago* (1 child) If you're only response to criticism of capitalism is ((communism)), you may just be a cog in the corporate propaganda machine. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago I mean they went with a literal cia link. permalink fedilink source parent [–] GeneralVincent@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (3 children) Thanks for the link to the unbiased study by... the CIA? Huh. Yeah I trust them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] olympicyes@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) The paper was from 1985. Was the CIA correct? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Marginally. The paper analyzes the capabilities as they existed in the 1980s, but doesn't draw strong conclusions as to why that may be. It does demonstrate how reliance on central planning results in inadequaciea when said central planning is not operating well, though. The paper doesn't really mention it but the central planning of the USSR was actively reeling from Brezhnev dying, Andropov dying, and Chernenko either dying or about to die at the time the CIA thing was written. So yeah, correct is an accurate if imprecise way to put it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Yeah it’s more a criticism of the ussr in the 80s. Central planning with more tech focus and more democracy would likely not face that specific issue. But also there’s room for shit like kanban communism which definitely wouldn’t have these problems permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago* (1 child) If you're only response to criticism of capitalism is ((communism)), you may just be a cog in the corporate propaganda machine. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago I mean they went with a literal cia link. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago I mean they went with a literal cia link. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GeneralVincent@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (3 children) Thanks for the link to the unbiased study by... the CIA? Huh. Yeah I trust them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] olympicyes@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) The paper was from 1985. Was the CIA correct? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Marginally. The paper analyzes the capabilities as they existed in the 1980s, but doesn't draw strong conclusions as to why that may be. It does demonstrate how reliance on central planning results in inadequaciea when said central planning is not operating well, though. The paper doesn't really mention it but the central planning of the USSR was actively reeling from Brezhnev dying, Andropov dying, and Chernenko either dying or about to die at the time the CIA thing was written. So yeah, correct is an accurate if imprecise way to put it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Yeah it’s more a criticism of the ussr in the 80s. Central planning with more tech focus and more democracy would likely not face that specific issue. But also there’s room for shit like kanban communism which definitely wouldn’t have these problems permalink fedilink source parent
[–] olympicyes@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) The paper was from 1985. Was the CIA correct? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Marginally. The paper analyzes the capabilities as they existed in the 1980s, but doesn't draw strong conclusions as to why that may be. It does demonstrate how reliance on central planning results in inadequaciea when said central planning is not operating well, though. The paper doesn't really mention it but the central planning of the USSR was actively reeling from Brezhnev dying, Andropov dying, and Chernenko either dying or about to die at the time the CIA thing was written. So yeah, correct is an accurate if imprecise way to put it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Yeah it’s more a criticism of the ussr in the 80s. Central planning with more tech focus and more democracy would likely not face that specific issue. But also there’s room for shit like kanban communism which definitely wouldn’t have these problems permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Marginally. The paper analyzes the capabilities as they existed in the 1980s, but doesn't draw strong conclusions as to why that may be. It does demonstrate how reliance on central planning results in inadequaciea when said central planning is not operating well, though. The paper doesn't really mention it but the central planning of the USSR was actively reeling from Brezhnev dying, Andropov dying, and Chernenko either dying or about to die at the time the CIA thing was written. So yeah, correct is an accurate if imprecise way to put it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Yeah it’s more a criticism of the ussr in the 80s. Central planning with more tech focus and more democracy would likely not face that specific issue. But also there’s room for shit like kanban communism which definitely wouldn’t have these problems permalink fedilink source parent
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Yeah it’s more a criticism of the ussr in the 80s. Central planning with more tech focus and more democracy would likely not face that specific issue. But also there’s room for shit like kanban communism which definitely wouldn’t have these problems permalink fedilink source parent
