Man Found Guilty of Child Porn, Because He Ran a Tor Exit Node::undefined

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 123 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (2 children)

They convicted him on "supporting the transfer of underage pornography", i.e. he ran an exit node that "allowed" the upload of CP to an Austrian image hoster. Apparently, he wasn't protected because he ran the exit as an individual, not a registered company. Most likely, the Austrian authority checked who uploaded the images, and found his IP address, which became the basis for convicting him. He didn't have any of the materials because all those stuffs were encrypted in transit.

He mentioned that law that was used to prosecute him was changed a few weeks later to protect individuals as well. He apparently now ran Tor exits under an offshore company.

In summary, from what he said, he just happened to run an unrestricted exit node that some people used to upload CP.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 57 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)
  • [–] 31 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I mean… that is the big issue with things like tor and the decentralized youtube alternative everyone wants.

    This is an issue on Lemmy as well, one that very few so far seem to have wisened up to. If you host a server and federate it, your server will pull, store and display the content your users are watching for all to see. So you could be on the hook for distributing illegal material if you don't preemptively defederate from instances potentially hosting content that is illegal for you to possess.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago (2 children)
  • [+] -20 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    I mean he's not. He did literally allow CP to be uploaded. And he literally wasn't legally protected.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 3 years ago

    But I personally can't support anything where "Oh well, I guess I accidentally supported the proliferation of CSAM".

    Does this mean you're opposed to, say, roads, because they can be used to transport child porn? How about postal services—they'll even pick it up and deliver it wherever you want!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Does he/people get paid for running the exit node?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments