politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
I agree with the title, but Semafor is not a real news source.
https://www.theverge.com/2024/2/5/24062229/semafor-signals-miso-ai-microsoft
Their "reporters" are just checking what an AI spews out.
And there's a lot more shady stuff this could be heading.
They've said they want to eventually tailor articles presented, headlines, and even article content to users.
The potential propaganda impact of something like this can not be ignored. People bitch about social media algorithms changing people's opinions, but this is disguised as a real new organization and wants to change the information shown on its site on a user by user basis to more effectively get people to the result the owners of the website works.
Uber used to provide a cheap effective service, so did Walmart. Once they get market share, the shit show begins.
Senafor is still in the process of capturing market share, dont help them accomplish that step so they can move into the shady shit
My take is that if you can't beat AI, and you're not, you might as well embrace it. You are obviously not going vote it out of existence. What you are describing is something Google's Meteor platform does every single minute of every single day for Google News.
My take is if you can't defeat the fascists and you can't, you might as well embrace it.
Shut the fuck up!
Ai = Fascists
Bwhahahahaha
Soon.