▲ 186 ▼ No thanks, I'll just tap my guitar instead. (i.ibb.co) submitted 3 years ago by radioactiveradio@lemm.ee to c/mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world 48 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Empyreus@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) I get that this probably revolves around saving money and not developing a full website and app, but man do I hate it. permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 7 points 3 years ago (1 child) No, it revolves around showing you more ads. Someone had to go to the effort to detect a mobile browser and force them into the app. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Empyreus@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago Detecting a mobile browser is easier than making every feature on your site mobile responsive, and confirming its a good mobile experience. Every add they show in the app could be shown in the browser, though I guess they would get access to notifications if that's the case. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 7 points 3 years ago (1 child) No, it revolves around showing you more ads. Someone had to go to the effort to detect a mobile browser and force them into the app. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Empyreus@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago Detecting a mobile browser is easier than making every feature on your site mobile responsive, and confirming its a good mobile experience. Every add they show in the app could be shown in the browser, though I guess they would get access to notifications if that's the case. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Empyreus@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago Detecting a mobile browser is easier than making every feature on your site mobile responsive, and confirming its a good mobile experience. Every add they show in the app could be shown in the browser, though I guess they would get access to notifications if that's the case. permalink fedilink source parent
