this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023
649 points (86.3% liked)

Showerthoughts

33672 readers
1116 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I can't really think of a reason for that as Reddit is hated somewhat equally by "both" sides of the spectrum. It's just something I find interesting.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Our current model is driving the world off an ecological cliff. The externalities of free market capitalism are fast approaching and it should be clear as day to any rational person that it is a massive failure.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Lmao capitalism I literally the innovation engine behind all green and sustainable development.

Fun fact: socialists also burned coal and oil

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Human ingenuity is the innovation engine behind all technological advancements. Capitalism stifled green tech for years, and still does, by putting way too much money in the hands of O and G companies who have had every motivation to do so to protect their business.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Lol capital is shifting non-green companies to be more sustainable, not the other way around.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Government subsidy is the driving force behind green technology. Capital has done everything in it's power to fight it to protect its O and G investments. Capitalism is an anti-innovation machine.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

An industry which sucks up government subsidy. An industry which would have never got off the ground without that subsidy. I guess you're the real socialist considering your industry wouldn't exist without all those government dollars, lol.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

So wait capital is defined as "government subsidies?" You sure you're not a capitalist?

Unironically, you know who gets too many subsidies? Small farmers. Kill the farm bill.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So your response to why would workers have no disputes is because pollution?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Well the idea that no workers would ever have any disputes was your contribution to the discussion, not a claim I ever made. Of course they would have disputes, and those disputes would be dealt with democratically. You like democracy, I assume?

My point in bringing up climate change is that people like to bring up the current system as a working model. But it doesn't work at all. If we continue doing things the way we are we are cooked.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

How many times has diplomacy ever solved a dispute? Munich 1938 is a great example on why they usually only delay the inevitable

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Presumably it works some of the time. My country doesn't descend into war every time there's an election.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 years ago

Those are not the disputes I'm talking about

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Diplomacy is like an oxygen supply: You only notice it when it fails. That doesn’t mean it doesn’t generally work.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You mean besides the decades the US and USSR didn’t blow the entire world to pieces or even enter direct conflict, which would likely have killed millions more than the proxy wars that occurred with diplomatic intervention? I’m sorry, I just can’t take anyone who truly thinks that diplomacy is always useless seriously. It strongly suggests they’ve never read a history book.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Nukes discouraging any escalation into war:

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There are going to be multiple factors in any international relations situation. I’m sorry you don’t understand that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Yeah, and the probability of nuclear annihilation is a hell of a factor to prevent war

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I mean, do you have a genuinely better alternative than a democracy with some rules to prevent ogliarchys and protect citizens rights?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

That's definitely not the same as having no private property

If someone hates what you said they're just stupid