13
submitted 2 years ago by Amoxtli to c/usnews@beehaw.org
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] leetnewb@beehaw.org 7 points 2 years ago

Not all that convincing, particularly when it draws quotes from other libertarian sources.

[-] Amoxtli 1 points 2 years ago

Did you want communist sources?

[-] off_brand_@beehaw.org 6 points 2 years ago

Wait what source would you consider Communist outside of relevant state medias?

[-] pbjamm@beehaw.org 4 points 2 years ago

anyone left of NewsMax

[-] leetnewb@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Strangely, no notification of your response on my screen like I normally get from post responses.

Anyway, I'm just saying that an article from an expressively libertarian education platform citing an outwardly libertarian think tank is a double whammy of credibility degradation. A communist source would generally be bad, a communist source citing a communist source would be double bad. I just don't think publications with a proud ideological bent make for reliable sources, but that charge is less meaningful if they draw on information and content that is unaligned with their core beliefs.

this post was submitted on 17 May 2024
13 points (100.0% liked)

U.S. News

2636 readers
42 users here now

News about and pertaining to the United States and its people.

Please read what's functionally the mission statement before posting for the first time. We have a narrower definition of news than you might be accustomed to.


Guidelines for submissions:

For World News, see the News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS