this post was submitted on 06 May 2024
369 points (93.2% liked)

Technology

59119 readers
3166 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The additional price of the full-range version is partially subsidizing the lower priced version.

That makes it even worse!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Because they are over charging people for the same hardware. Everyone is receiving the same product except for the fact that the cheaper one is hamstrung by an unnecessary software change. If it wasn't for that all these cars would be identical. If they can sell it cheaper then do so. If they can't don't. If you want to have different price tiers make a version with more actual features. How are you not seeing this as a bad thing?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Because there is no inherent link between the cost of manufacturing a product and the price at which it’s sold.

If they can sell it cheaper then do so. If they can't don't.

So if Tesla develops new technology that allows them to produce cars cheaper, should they be required to lower the sale price of their vehicles?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So if Tesla develops new technology that allows them to produce cars cheaper, should they be required to lower the sale price of their vehicles?

No, they price them based off tons of factors. I understand that. What I'm saying is they've demonstrated that they can sell the vehicle at that cheaper price point so do it. If it only works because the people paying more are subsidizing the cheaper ones then the price should probably be somewhere in the middle. When they are selling two identical vehicles those should be the same price. What they are doing is the same as if they were selling a "headlights" version and "no headlights" version and accomplishing that by just smashing the headlights on the latter as they roll of the line. It's dishonest, stupid, and wasteful.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

They’re not destroying anything. The car can still be upgraded by either the current owner or the next one.

Ironically, you’re advocating for going through the effort of physically removing batteries to sell at a lower price. That’s closer to your headlight analogy. The car was designed to have a specific battery size, and the equipment is already built to make that size. It is not easy to physically alter the batteries at scale.