662
we fell for the corporate propoganda rule (lemmy.cafe)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
68 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 224 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Any tool that calls itself “open source” and uses proprietary encryption that they refuse to let any neutral third party review, should absolutely not be trusted.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 138 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    It's open standard, not open source

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Wonder if maybe there could be some organization that could fill that need. Independent, or a collection of industry vets, who look through the code and say if it’s safe or not. With the assumption details won’t be leaked or something to protect anything actually proprietary?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •