you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 56 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Their just retvrning to tradition

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I was going to say wasn't this common in the age of sail? I remember reading something about sailors drowning often because they couldn't swim, and that was just expected

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 53 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    It was considered bad luck to know how to swim because the water already had a taste of you and wouldn't give you up

    Which to me just sounds like they didn't care if you lived or died

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 50 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    That sounds like something an officer makes up to convince dudes that can't swim not to worry about it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I mean, if you're a sailor and you end up overboard, you're probably gonna die. Idk if you have ever been in the North Sea, but it is cold and choppy and even a modern life vest wont keep you alive for long. Even a strong swimmer stands little chamce of survival if they go overboard on a ship.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    oh yea I'm aware of how deadly cold water can be. I agree all those dudes were probably going to die anyway if their ship sunk, it just sounded like something you'd say if you just don't want someone dwelling on that fact

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 37 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    It was really because it didn't make a difference - if you went overboard, you died, no matter how good at swimming you were.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments