this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
16 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

5 readers
1 users here now

@politics on kbin.social is a magazine to share and discuss current events news, opinion/analysis, videos, or other informative content related to politicians, politics, or policy-making at all levels of governance (federal, state, local), both domestic and international. Members of all political perspectives are welcome here, though we run a tight ship. Community guidelines and submission rules were co-created between the Mod Team and early members of @politics. Please read all community guidelines and submission rules carefully before engaging our magazine.

founded 2 years ago
 

Quick Wikipedia Summary:

The Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) was a voluntary government work relief program that ran from 1933 to 1942 in the United States for unemployed, unmarried men ages 18–25 and eventually expanded to ages 17–28.[1] The CCC was a major part of President Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal that supplied manual labor jobs related to the conservation and development of natural resources in rural lands owned by federal, state, and local governments. The CCC was designed to supply jobs for young men and to relieve families who had difficulty finding jobs during the Great Depression in the United States.

In the US, we have many infrastructure programs falling to the wayside such as old and failing city water systems, electrical service, and outdated public transit.

I understand the maasive ammounts of money and coordination has to go into a project like this. But to me, introducing a program like the defunct CCC would allow struggling Americans to have a steady path of employment throughout the nation. More money in the workers pockets, less unemployment, and an improved society afterwards. This to me seems like a win win win, what am I missimg here?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hi @Upvotes_Kills_Birds ! Really glad to see someone testing out the discussion thread format in our magazine!

Will you please edit your title so that it starts with 'Discussion:' to help differentiate it from other submissions to news/opinion pieces?

The mod team is finalizing our magazine's side bar rules, but our approach to moderating Discussion threads is going to be an "enter at your own risk" caveat, so having those spaces clearly marked helps communicate to users that they should expect opposing views in the comments more than some news items may invite.

Thank you kindly!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Edited.

I think thats a good plan, especially while the sizes of the community is still smaller and more manageable.