Asklemmy

43942 readers

474 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

1194

How many Lemmy users are non-technical background? (programming.dev)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

668 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I think most all of us here on Lemmy are people with technical background. Most of my professional contacts remained using Reddit, Twitter and even excited when Threads launched.

If you are non-tech background, please comment and share what you do for life.

If you have tech background, upvote this to help promote this post so that we can find more non-tech users on Lemmy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Airline pilot. Surprisingly low technical knowledge required considering how computerized airplanes are.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Airplanes tech is designed easy to use for the pilot. You wouldn't want to debug an error during a flight mid-air.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Very true. It does very occasionally do some strange things, but then we just either disengage the autopilot, or change modes to something simpler while we try and figure out what went wrong (it’s almost always that we’ve made a mistake).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I would expect that software to be very well tested. Not like Microsoft Windows. :)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

"Wait, what's wrong with our malloc() implementation??" - screams whilst flying over the Pacific