1
4
submitted 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Ketogenic: The Science of Therapeutic Carbohydrate Restriction in Human Health presents the most up-to-date and evidence-based science and research available in the field of TCR, with the purpose of training medical and allied healthcare professionals on the effective therapeutic use of low-carbohydrate and ketogenic nutrition in clinical practice. This book explores the appropriate, safe, and effective use of TCR to improve patient outcomes in a broad range of chronic metabolic conditions and aims to promote health.

Focused on lifestyle management, health support and the treatment of diseases rooted in poor nutrition, this book explores the role of food and lifestyle modification as medicine and is a valuable resource for nutritionists, dietitians and medical professionals who provide diet-related counselling, as well as those researching or studying related areas.

  • Presents new best-practice guidelines for using TCR to treat, improve or reverse nutrition-related metabolic conditions and diseases that were previously thought to have a chronic, irreversible progression
  • Provides an overview of the most recent evidence outlining the biochemistry and physiology pertaining to human nutrition and health
  • Offers evolutionary and historical context to human nutrition
  • Contains clinical practice guidelines for the implementation of TCR from medical practitioners who prescribe TCR in their practices, allowing readers to understand real-life concerns in the field
  • Features case studies that provide practical examples of how to assess, monitor and intervene with patients that practitioners encounter in their practices
  • Explains the physiology and biochemistry of the normal and pathophysiological state for each condition and links these to the application of TCR

https://doi.org/10.1016/C2019-0-03604-7 Full Book is available on the normal book sharing websites.

Chapter 1 - Understanding human diet, disease, and insulin resistance: scientific and evolutionary perspectives

Nutritional authorities promote high-carbohydrate, low-fat diets to combat modern diseases such as obesity, type 2 diabetes and heart disease. However, the science behind this ideology is flawed. Virtually everything the public knows about diet can be challenged. The foods that cause harm are the very food groups the public believes are healthy: carbohydrates and polyunsaturated vegetable oils. Conversely, human physiology, from brain size to gastrointestinal morphology appears to support a carnivorous design. While low amounts of certain carbohydrates are tolerable, chronic consumption of processed carbohydrates promotes non-communicable diseases (NCDs). Indigenous cultures adopting modern agriculture develop diseases practically absent beforehand. Processed foods have been linked to systemic inflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and more. Their mechanism is insulin resistance, which is crucially involved in most NCDs. The chronic disease pandemic only worsens despite the billions of dollars invested to treat them. A new perspective is needed.

Chapter 2 - Nutritional aspectsWith evidence pointing to the efficacy of therapeutic carbohydrate restriction (TCR), official protocols for implementation into clinical practice are required. During the metabolic transition from a high-carbohydrate to a TCR diet, clinical considerations and patient guidance are required. Aside from the formulation and prescription of TCR, clinicians must be familiar with the precautions, assessment, and monitoring of clinical outcomes associated with this intervention. Nutritional ketosis is a physiological ketosis of the fed state with specific biochemical and nutritional aspects that must be taken into account in TCR. Understanding this metabolic state, as well as the biochemistry and physiology of ketone metabolism, is critical. When prescribing TCR, the clinician must also understand the context of nutrient requirements, as well as the differences between animal and plant nutrition. This chapter discusses the most important nutritional aspects to consider and comprehend when prescribing TCR.

Chapter 3 - EndocrineEndocrine dysregulation is the hallmark of modern chronic disease, with insulin resistance (IR) playing a central role. Research surrounding treatments to such disorders are complicated due to complex hormonal regulation of homoeostasis, with the liver playing a central role. Yet recognising the common pathology provides a more universally applicable approach to treatment: the target and regulation of insulin. Therapeutic carbohydrate restriction (TCR) has efficacy in regulating insulin, often without the need for, or with the deprescription of, pharmacotherapeutics. The most evidence for TCR focuses on its induced remission of metabolic syndrome (MetS), IR, and type 2 diabetes (T2D). Emerging research also supports its use for type 1 diabetes (T1D), polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) and regulation of the thyroid and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal-axis. Overall, TCR is promising in the treatment of endocrine disorders, often surpassing many medications prescribed to treat them.

Chapter 4 - Cardiovascular disease and its association with insulin resistance and cholesterolAs the main nutrient delivery system, the cardiovascular system is intimately tied to metabolic health. Insulin resistance (IR) is implicated in atherosclerosis through numerous pathophysiologies, causing a variety of problems from stroke and renal failure to congestive heart failure (CHF) and myocardial infarction (MI). The traditional atherosclerosis model, the diet (lipid) heart hypothesis, wrongly demonises LDL, a biologically essential, multifunctional transport molecule, which is more likely atheroprotective than atherogenic. The resultant prescription of cholesterol-lowering medications (statins and PCSK9 inhibitors) arguably worsen heart health and IR. Evidence is presented for the role of therapeutic carbohydrate restriction (TCR), despite its high fat and cholesterol content, in reducing IR and improving overall cardiometabolic risk (lipids and blood pressure).

Chapter 5 - NeurologyThe brain is a metabolically demanding organ and thus sensitive to nutrient availability. It is not ordinarily conceived to be predisposed to metabolic syndromes, though research postulates insulin resistance and chronic hyperglycaemia may be behind most neurological disorders, redefining them from a metabolic perspective. High-carbohydrate diets also have an important psychological impact. The brain has been evolutionarily programmed to treat carbohydrates as a reward, activating dopaminergic cascades due to their historical scarcity. This neurobiology has disadvantages in an age of carbohydrate abundance. While the brain is perceived as a glucose-dependent organ, ketone bodies are an alternative and possibly superior fuel, allowing patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD), dementia, and mood disorders to improve their glucose hypometabolic states and associated symptoms. Ketogenic diets (KDs) are an accepted standard of treatment for refractory epilepsies and alleviate neuroinflammation in other neuropathologies. Research on the KD in the treatment of these disorders is in its infancy, yet has demonstrable restorative potential begging further investigation.

Chapter 6 - CancerSince the discovery of DNA, the metabolic theory of cancer has been sidelined for genetic research. Yet cancer continues to rise. New research recaptures mitochondria as the driver, while upregulation of oncogenes and tumour suppressor mutations are recognised as downstream of the damage to oxidative phosphorylation (OxPhos). Despite the prevalence of the somatic (genetic) mutation theory, there are numerous inconsistencies. In contrast, it appears that all cancers are characterised by dysfunctional mitochondria. Cancer pre-1960 was a rare disease, all of which has changed as diets have. Press-pulse therapy and ketogenic diets (KD) have proven effective therapies, due to cancers’ selective metabolism of glucose and glutamine (Warburg effect), in combination with the non-fermentability of ketones. Some dietary aspects are individualised to the patient and cancer, but follow this general protocol. Fasting induces additional selective stress to cancers. With cancer genetic research stagnating and metabolic approaches showing promise, this perspective offers a new path forward.

Chapter 7 - Musculoskeletal and immunological considerationsMusculoskeletal conditions are primarily thought to be age-related and unavoidable. While age is a factor for musculoskeletal functional decline, an association with age should be considered alongside lifestyle factors. Inflammation accompanies musculoskeletal conditions, and should be targeted when considering interventions for these conditions. Diet is a key modulator of inflammation. The Western diet is known to contribute to inflammation and can negatively affect the microbiome, both of which are implicated in autoimmune disease. Therapeutic carbohydrate restriction (TCR), on the other hand, shows promise for improving inflammation and the microbiome, as well as rheumatic and autoimmune conditions. As it relates to age-associated declines, a well-formulated TCR protocol naturally is animal nutrient-centric, meaning it supplies sufficient protein, minerals, and fat-soluble vitamins to prevent or delay chronic conditions and bone and joint issues, supplemented with exercise (which itself demonstrates similar preventative effects). TCR, in addition to metabolic improvement, has well-documented effects of improvement in age associated physiology, such as visceral adiposity, decline of cognition, bone mass, density, and muscle mass, and increased risk for chronic disease associated mortality. In this chapter the role of TCR as a promising supportive treatment for many rheumatic and autoimmune conditions, as well as age-related conditions is discussed.

Chapter 8 - Gastrointestinal health and therapeutic carbohydrate restrictionHuman health is tied to the microbiome, and dysbiosis begets disease. Many gastrointestinal (GI) conditions cause unnecessary proliferation of normal gut microbiota, leading to dysbiosis, painful symptoms and hunger signal dysregulation. Dysbiosis causes damage to tight junctions and provides an entryway for pathogens to systemic circulation, which leads to a variety of conditions, including allergies, intolerances and even autoimmune reactions. Other disorders exist in the liver, pancreas, hepatic portal system and gallbladder, all of which follow from poor dietary choices. Therapeutic carbohydrate restriction or the ketogenic diet (KD) is, by nature, closely related to diets with evidence of efficacy for various GI conditions (namely, specific carbohydrate diet and low-FODMAP diets). Unsurprisingly then, evidence is emerging regarding a similar efficacy. The KD is animal-based and as such excludes many plant-based gut irritants. Some troubleshooting and individualisation may be required, but an adapted KD has long-term clinical potential to alleviate many GI conditions and deserves more clinical application.

Chapter 9 - Exercise and sports performanceThe role of fat adaptation and carbohydrate restriction for athletes is an emerging and controversial area. Many athletes voice concern over glycogen depletion with carbohydrate-restricted diets. Though, with mounting metabolic concerns of chronic excessive carbohydrate consumption manifesting in athletes, alternative ergogenic protocols need be devised to sustain health and performance in athletes. Much research on the metabolic effects of ketogenic diets (KDs) and low carbohydrate, high fat (LCHF) diets and related supplementation in athletes is ongoing. Most literature concentrates on high-carbohydrate male athletes and cannot apply to ketogenic or female athletes without considering metabolic differences. The research that has surfaced on KDs maligns it with performance impairment due to trial brevity. Other studies accounting for the extensive period of metabolic reprogramming generally show performance maintenance or improvement. Athletic nutrition and performance are individualised and troubleshooting may be needed. Case studies have emerged of KDs showing benefit in some athletes, emphasising the need for clinical trials.

Chapter 10 - Therapeutic fastingFasting is a voluntary, controlled period of abstinence from food that is important to human evolution and has medical, spiritual, and cultural significance in most areas of the world. However, in Westernised countries, incidence and duration of fasting has decreased due to dietary emphasis on snacking. This shift has profound health effects due to the continual suppression of fasting-state gluconeogenesis, nutritional ketosis, and protein conservation, often resetting the cycle before blood glucose and insulin falls. Patients may voice concerns over malnutrition or nutrient depletion, though evidence underscores the physiological differences between fasting (benefits) and starvation (complications). Contraindications and cautions are few but require consideration. Fasting is an effective regimen as it minimises time and financial expenditure, in addition to having health benefits and enhancing longevity.

Chapter 11 - Psychological, behavioural, and ethical considerationsA dietary intervention is only effective in the long term if it is sustainable. Sustainable health improvements require persistent changes in thoughts and behaviour, as well as control over eating. There are techniques healthcare practitioners can employ to guide patients towards behaviour change, while encouraging them to take responsibility for their own health and achieve lasting improvements. Therapeutic carbohydrate restriction (TCR), gives patients a physiological advantage by controlling hunger (despite reduced caloric intake and weight loss); offering a sustainable alternative to conventional hypocaloric weight loss interventions, which usually result in hunger and rebound weight gains. Evidence indicates that ultra-processed food (UPF) may also play a role in cravings and eating control, promoting addictive eating behaviours that thwart health and weight loss efforts. TCR eliminates UPF and thus, as an adjunct to other behavioural and psychological interventions, may offer a treatment modality to address addictive eating. While TCR is a relatively novel nutritional evidence-based modality that challenges current dietary guidelines, healthcare practitioners have an ethical responsibility to fulfil the Hippocratic values that underlie western medical ethics, to first do no harm. In the light of evidence indicating the harmful effects of conventional high-carbohydrate diets on metabolic health, TCR public health advocacy is one of the most crucial ethical duties of healthcare professionals in modern times.

2
3
submitted 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Comprehensive Resources

Primary Research

Epidemiology

Reviews

Models

3
3
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Nina Teicholz is a New York Times bestselling investigative science journalist who has played a pivotal role in challenging the conventional wisdom on dietary fat. Her groundbreaking work, 'The Big Fat Surprise', which The Economist named as the #1 science book of 2014, has led to a profound rethinking on whether we have been wrong to think that fat, including saturated fat, causes disease.

Nina continues to explore the political, institutional, and industry forces that prevent better thinking on issues related to nutrition and science. She has been published in the New York Times, the New Yorker, the British Medical Journal, Gourmet, the Los Angeles Times and many other outlets.

  • Nina Teicholz's Background: Teicholz is an investigative journalist and author of "The Big Fat Surprise," which challenges conventional wisdom about dietary fats, particularly saturated fats. She is also a founder of the Nutrition Coalition, advocating for evidence-based nutrition policies.
  • Historical Context of Dietary Fat Guidelines: The belief that saturated fats and dietary cholesterol cause heart disease originated from Ancel Keys' diet-heart hypothesis in the 1950s. This hypothesis gained traction despite limited evidence and became widely accepted, influencing dietary guidelines for decades.
  • Scientific Evidence: Recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses of clinical trials have found no support for the diet-heart hypothesis. The data do not show that saturated fats cause heart disease, leading to a shift in scientific understanding.
  • Influence of Industry and Politics: The vegetable oil industry, pharmaceutical interests, and political agendas have resisted changes to dietary guidelines. These groups have a vested interest in maintaining the status quo, making it difficult to implement new scientific findings.
  • Health Impacts of Vegetable Oils: Vegetable oils, originally used for industrial purposes, were marketed as healthy alternatives to saturated fats. However, they are highly unstable and prone to oxidation, which can lead to inflammation and other health issues, including cancer.
  • Clinical Trials and Outcomes: Large clinical trials from the 1960s and 1970s, which were initially interpreted to support the diet-heart hypothesis, have been re-examined and found to be flawed. Many of these studies did not show the expected benefits of replacing saturated fats with vegetable oils.
  • Nutrition Guidelines and Policy: The U.S. dietary guidelines have not included crucial evidence from large clinical trials. The process of creating these guidelines is influenced by various interests, leading to recommendations that may not be fully supported by science.
  • Vegan and Plant-Based Diets: The evidence for the health benefits of vegan and plant-based diets is limited and often based on weak forms of evidence, such as population studies and observational data. Clinical trials supporting these diets are scarce and often flawed.
  • Blue Zones and Long-Lived Populations: The Blue Zones, often cited as examples of long-lived populations with plant-based diets, are not unique. Other long-lived populations have diverse diets, and the specific contributions of diet to longevity in these regions are not well understood.
  • Personal Health and Diet: Teicholz emphasizes the importance of individual health and dietary choices. She follows a low-carb diet, which has improved her health, but acknowledges that perfection is not necessary. She advocates for a balanced approach that prioritizes nutrient-dense foods.
  • Future of Nutrition Science: There is hope for a paradigm shift in nutrition science, with growing research supporting low-carb and high-fat diets. However, political and financial interests continue to pose challenges to widespread acceptance and implementation of these findings.
4
-1
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

The video is an interview with Sally K. Norton, an expert on oxalates and their impact on health. Norton discusses the basics of oxalates, their sources, and the potential health issues they can cause, including kidney stones, arthritis, and mitochondrial damage. She highlights high-oxalate foods like spinach, nuts, and sweet potatoes, and explains that a low-oxalate diet can help alleviate symptoms. Norton also addresses common misconceptions, such as the belief that certain bacteria can heal the gut and eliminate oxalate issues.

5
6
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

After 12 weeks, anthropometric and body composition measurements revealed a significant reduction of body weight (− 9.43 kg), BMI (− 3.35), FBM (8.29 kg) and VAT. There was a significant, slightly decrease of LBM. A significant decrease in glucose and insulin blood levels were observed, together with a significant improvement of HOMA-IR. A significant decrease of triglycerides, total cholesterol and LDL were observed along with a rise in HDL levels. The LH/FSH ratio, LH total and free testosterone, and DHEAS blood levels were also significantly reduced. Estradiol, progesterone and SHBG increased. The Ferriman Gallwey Score was slightly, although not significantly, reduced.

Our results suggest that a KD may be considered as a valuable non pharmacological treatment for PCOS. Longer treatment periods should be tested to verify the effect of a KD on the dermatological aspects of PCOS.

Full Paper: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-020-02277-0

6
-2
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Is everything you’ve heard about carbs, seed oils, and diabetes wrong? Dr. Westman and Bart Kay dig into the real science.

summerizer

Summary

In this extensive and candid conversation between Dr. Eric Westman and Bart K, a former health science professor turned influential keto and carnivore diet advocate, the discussion primarily focuses on the flaws in nutritional epidemiology, the misinformation surrounding low-carb and ketogenic diets, and the challenges of implementing evidence-based nutritional advice in modern medicine. Bart K shares his journey from academia, where his radical views on carbohydrate requirements and fiber were met with resistance, to becoming an online influencer educating the public about metabolic health and nutritional myths. He underscores the fundamental flaws in nutritional epidemiology studies, particularly their reliance on self-reported dietary data and inappropriate statistical adjustments, which often lead to misleading conclusions about diet and health.

The dialogue also tackles the prevailing misconceptions about low-carb diets, such as the unfounded fear that high fat intake causes heart disease or cancer. Both speakers emphasize that type 2 diabetes is fundamentally about chronically elevated blood glucose, not simply insulin resistance or deficiency, and criticize the medical system’s reliance on pharmaceutical interventions over dietary solutions. The conversation highlights the challenges physicians face in promoting nutrition due to systemic constraints, commercial interests, and professional risks.

Bart K expresses optimism about grassroots changes driven by informed individuals and emerging research, including the growing acceptance of ketogenic therapies in cardiology and the rise of carnivore diet proponents. However, he acknowledges the difficulty of conducting long-term, rigorous clinical trials on diets due to ethical and practical constraints. The discussion concludes with a call for critical thinking, individual experimentation, and skepticism of authority in nutrition science, encouraging people to explore low-carb or carnivore diets gradually while monitoring their own health outcomes.

Highlights

  • 🥩 Bart K advocates for a 100% carnivore diet as the species-appropriate human diet.
  • 📉 Nutritional epidemiology is deeply flawed due to reliance on self-reported data and improper statistical adjustments.
  • 🔬 Association does not imply causation; many diet-health claims are based on misleading correlations.
  • 💊 The medical system favors drug interventions over dietary changes due to financial incentives.
  • 🍽️ Type 2 diabetes is fundamentally about elevated blood glucose, not just insulin resistance.
  • 📊 True scientific causality in nutrition is hard to establish due to ethical and practical research constraints.
  • 🌱 Emerging research and grassroots movements are fostering new perspectives on keto, carnivore, and metabolic health.

Key Insights

  • 🔍 Flaws in Nutritional Epidemiology: In-depth Analysis
    Bart K explains that nutritional epidemiology studies are inherently unreliable because they rely on infrequent, self-reported dietary surveys that are inaccurate by nature. These studies often use complex statistical techniques like multivariate regression that violate key assumptions such as independence of variables, leading to invalid conclusions. For example, adjusting for age while studying long-term diet-related disease incidence creates collinearity, making the data mathematically invalid. This calls into question much of the dietary advice based on such studies, including the demonization of saturated fat and meat consumption.

  • 🧪 Association Does Not Equal Causation: Critical Thinking Needed
    Both experts stress that a high correlation between a dietary factor and disease does not prove that one causes the other. They illustrate this with humorous examples (ice cream sales and sunburn incidence) to highlight how such data can be misleading. This misunderstanding fuels pseudoscientific claims in nutrition and public health. The takeaway is that consumers and practitioners must critically evaluate scientific claims and not accept correlations as proof.

  • 🍏 Misconceptions About Low-Carb and Keto Diets
    The conversation debunks common fears that low-carb or ketogenic diets cause heart disease or cancer. Bart K and Dr. Westman emphasize that these diets often reduce hunger and promote steady weight loss, making them sustainable and effective. They also argue that insulin resistance is not the root cause of type 2 diabetes but rather a protective response to chronic hyperglycemia caused by excessive carbohydrate intake. Thus, reducing carbs is a logical and effective intervention.

  • 💊 Pharmaceutical Industry vs. Nutrition: Systemic Challenges
    There is a critical view of the medical establishment’s preference for drug treatments over dietary interventions, largely driven by financial incentives. Drugs like insulin or SGLT2 inhibitors are prescribed widely for diabetes and heart failure, despite the potential for dietary approaches to achieve similar or better results without adverse side effects. This systemic bias inhibits the adoption of nutritional therapies even when evidence supports their efficacy.

  • 📈 The Role of Ketones and Emerging Research in Cardiovascular Health
    Interestingly, new research in cardiology is exploring ketones as a therapeutic agent for heart failure, often via drugs that induce ketosis (e.g., SGLT2 inhibitors). This paradoxically introduces ketones into mainstream medicine, though through pharmaceutical routes rather than diet. This development might pave the way for broader acceptance of ketogenic diets in clinical practice, but the financial motivations behind drug promotion remain a barrier.

  • 🥩 Carnivore Diet as the Ultimate Species-Specific Diet
    Bart K strongly advocates the carnivore diet, claiming it to be the natural, optimal diet for humans based on anthropological evidence such as nitrogen isotope analysis of ancient human remains showing high animal product consumption pre-agriculture. Despite skepticism and lack of long-term randomized controlled trials (RCTs), he asserts that the carnivore diet has solid scientific and clinical foundations and is gaining traction, evidenced by new educational courses and patient interest.

  • 🧬 Challenges in Conducting Long-Term Nutrition Trials
    Both speakers agree that high-quality, long-term RCTs to definitively prove causality in nutrition are nearly impossible due to ethical, practical, and financial constraints. Human subjects cannot be locked in controlled environments for decades, and dietary adherence is difficult to monitor objectively over long periods. Consequently, much of nutrition science remains observational or mechanistic, and individuals must rely on personal experimentation and biomarker monitoring.

  • 🧠 The Need for Critical Thinking and Personal Experimentation
    Ultimately, the dialogue encourages moving beyond blind trust in authorities, government guidelines, or even academic consensus. Instead, individuals should engage in personal experimentation, using modern tools like continuous glucose monitors, artery ultrasounds, and lipid profiles to assess their health responses to different diets. This pragmatic approach empowers people to find what works best for their unique biology and circumstances.

  • 🛑 Critique of Medical Education and Practice on Nutrition
    Bart K criticizes medical training for lacking robust nutrition education, leaving physicians ill-equipped to counsel patients on diet. Physicians are often “trained monkey grinders,” bound by professional norms and punitive licensing boards to avoid deviating from established dogma. This institutional inertia suppresses innovation and honest dialogue about effective dietary therapies, forcing patients to seek alternative sources of information.

  • 🌿 Grassroots Movements and New Generations of Doctors
    Despite systemic obstacles, there is optimism about change driven by younger physicians and researchers independently exploring ketogenic and carnivore diets. The growing grassroots interest, online education, and patient-driven demand are gradually challenging the status quo. This bottom-up momentum may eventually influence mainstream medicine and public health policy.

Conclusion

This conversation offers a profound critique of the current state of nutritional science and medicine, revealing the deep flaws in epidemiological research, the misinformation surrounding diet and chronic disease, and the systemic barriers to adopting effective dietary therapies like low-carb and carnivore diets. Bart K and Dr. Westman advocate for a return to rigorous scientific principles, critical thinking, and personal experimentation, while highlighting the growing momentum of grassroots movements and emerging research validating metabolic health interventions. Their message is clear: individuals should be empowered to explore dietary approaches grounded in evolutionary biology and clinical outcomes rather than flawed statistics and commercial interests.

Low Carb High Fat - Ketogenic

56 readers
4 users here now

A casual community to talk about LCHF/Ketogenic lifestyles, issues, benefits, difficulties, recipes, foods.

The more science focused sister community is [email protected]

Rules

  1. Be nice
  2. Stay on topic
  3. Don’t farm rage
  4. Be respectful of other diets, choices, lifestyles!!!
  5. No Blanket down voting - If you only come to this community to downvote its the wrong community for you

founded 3 weeks ago
MODERATORS