1
17

Google will pay $135 million to settle a proposed class action by smartphone users who accused Google of programming its Android operating system to collect their cellular data without permission. A preliminary settlement with the Alphabet (GOOGL.O), opens new tab unit was filed late Tuesday night in the San Jose, California federal court, and requires a judge's approval. Google denied wrongdoing in agreeing to the settlement, which covers users of Android-powered mobile devices since November 12, 2017. Users said Google needlessly collected cellular data, which they purchased from mobile carriers, even when they closed Google's apps, disabled location-sharing or locked their screens. They said the data supported Google's product development and targeted advertising campaigns and amounted to "conversion," when a party wrongfully takes another party's property with the intent to assert control. As part of the settlement, Google will not transfer data without obtaining consent from Android users when they set up their phones. The Mountain View, California-based company will also make it easier for users to stop the transfers by toggling, and will disclose the transfers in its Google Play terms of service. Glen Summers, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, said in a court filing he believed the $135 million payout is the largest ever in a conversion case. Payments are capped at $100 per class member. A trial had been scheduled for August 5. Google had no immediate comment on Wednesday. The plaintiffs' lawyers may seek up to $39.8 million, or 29.5% of the settlement fund, for legal fees.

2
27
3
17
4
14

Apple and Google would like to see your identification, please.

With the former’s “Digital ID” launch last week, both companies now let you scan a digital version of your passport at more than 250 Transportation Security Administration checkpoints, using an iPhone or Android phone. A growing number of U.S. states already support digital driver’s licenses for the same purpose.

But the push for these digital IDs isn’t merely about airport security (which still requires you to carry a physical license or passport anyway). It’s really part of a broader effort to verify who you are online, one that can finally start in earnest with passport-based digital IDs that are available nationwide.

This story first appeared in Advisorator, Jared’s weekly tech advice newsletter. Sign up to get more insights every Tuesday. How it works

Apple and Google have similar processes for digitizing a license or passport:

Open the Apple Wallet (iPhone) or Google Wallet (Android) app.
Hit the + button and select the “ID” option.
Scan your ID’s main page with your phone’s camera.
Scan the back of your license, or place your phone on top of your passport’s barcode page to scan the embedded RFID chip.
Submit a photo of your face.
Capture one or more short videos of your face performing some kind of movement. (This is presumably to prevent someone from digitizing your ID without permission.)

After a brief verification period, you’ll be able to access your ID through your phone’s digital wallet screen, the same place you’d use Apple Pay or Google Pay.

While digital passports are available nationwide, support for digital driver’s licenses or state IDs varies. Apple and Google currently let you digitize a license from Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Georgia, Iowa, Maryland, Montana, New Mexico, North Dakota, and Puerto Rico. Apple’s system also works in Hawaii and Ohio. A smaller number of states maintain their own digital ID apps, either in addition to or instead of Apple’s and Google’s versions, as listed on the TSA website.

Scanning a license or passport doesn’t mean you can leave the print version at home. The TSA may still want to see the real thing, and passport control agencies won’t accept the digital version when you cross the border.

Moreover, digital ID support will be spotty outside of airports. While some states have been encouraging bars, restaurants, and other businesses to accept digital IDs, the merchant needs a phone or other identity-reader hardware for that. Much like in the early days of Apple Pay and Google Pay, trying to use your digital ID probably won’t be worth the potential weird looks and awkwardness. So what’s the point?

Apple and Google both have bigger plans for digital IDs beyond just a slightly more seamless TSA process.

Apple’s Digital ID setup page, for instance, says it’ll eventually work while booking flights or hotels and opening new online accounts. Google is more specific, saying its digital ID will let you recover an Amazon account if you’re locked out, log into health portals such as CVS Health and Epic’s MyChart, and verify your profile with companies like Uber. Some states that have enacted age verification laws for porn sites have started accepting digital IDs as well.

Therein lies the true endgame with these digital IDs: The point isn’t really to replace physical IDs in the real world, but to verify your identity in the digital one. You can easily imagine a future in which a digital passport lives alongside or even replaces traditional passwords as a way to prove who you are online, with a verification process that feels a lot like checking out with Apple Pay.

This obviously introduces some new concerns. The convenience of digital IDs could also become an excuse to gate off large swaths of the internet, so you might need ID to visit a local brewery’s website, rent an R-rated digital movie, or access sites with social features of any kind.

And while Apple and Google tout the ability to keep your personal details private—for instance, by sharing just your age with a website without revealing your name or address—that assumes the companies asking for your ID won’t request or store more details than they need. Combined with broader use of digital IDs, this could make it a lot harder to browse the internet anonymously.

A lot of this is still theoretical, but it seems to be the future we’re headed toward. So be aware of what Apple and Google are really asking for when they encourage you to create a digital ID. In the long run it’s about a lot more than getting through the airport.

5
35
6
34
7
1

cross-posted from: https://sopuli.xyz/post/37823770

Every bank, shitty giant social media platform and countless websites demand a phone number. It’s foolish to give them a voice number (esp. mobile) unless you actually welcome calls from them, their partners, whoever they sell your data to, and whoever exfiltrates it. The best move with all these untrustworthy data-sharing-happy businesses is to give them a pure fax number which is answered only by a fax machine.

In the rare case where reaching you is so important that they would use the number to send you a fax, then it’s probably a message you want to receive anyway (and best to have it in writing). I kept a gratis fax number for decades and never got fax spam.

One extra perk to this is if customer files have fax-only numbers, it could give some pause before a company decides to ditch their fax line.

My unsolved problem:

J2.com no longer gives free fax numbers. I can only find providers who charge a flat subscription of ~$15—25/month (which includes an allowance on outbound faxes). I don’t really need a fax sending svc. I wouldn’t mind paying <$10/year just to have a number that emails faxes to me, even if there is some small measured rate when it actually gets used. A pay-per-fax service like that is hard to find. Any tips would be appreciated.

8
183
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by ooli3@sopuli.xyz to c/FightForPrivacy@sopuli.xyz
9
4
10
4
11
1
12
3
13
2
14
2

Fight For Privacy

73 readers
22 users here now

Privacy is a fundamental human right, we have to fight for in data capitalism.

Everything about privacy, and means , from legal to obfuscation we can use to protect human way of life

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS