[–] [S] -2 points 4 days ago (1 child)

i mean like it's a form of discipline for myself only, i know love works for others but if i get too accepting of myself then i lose sight of what i must fix on myself if that makes sense

it's a form of discipline only i use, it's not good for others

as for great love i identify more with the whole "communism is the hammer which crushes the enemy" thing mao said than castro's idea of great love, i feel the latter can be used once global revolution has occurred but focusing on the danger of the omnipresent enemy is priority imo

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [+] [S] -10 points 5 days ago (10 children)

    you can argue yes to those questions given they both still relied on goods obtained via imperialism though, like yes the impact they had on the movement is huge but foe example, a simple meal still was obtained by the suffering of the global south if that makes sense which is what i think about every time i consume sustenance

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [+] [S] -12 points 5 days ago (12 children)

    the average russian worker wasn't an imperialist parasite whose food, goods, existence, etc. innately involved the exploitation of the global south and therefore provided a net negative to the movement though

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: next ›