[–] [S] 3 points 14 hours ago

You are very correct. I am fortunate enough to have one family member help me financially alongside the financial aid the social program i am in allows me to have. That said, I am painfully aware that most don’t even have that extra help I happen to have.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 4 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

    I am aware that imperialism funds those programs. Imperialism also funds the high salary of doctors, lawyers, or software engineers etc, and it basically assists everyone in all imperial nations in this way. Of course, I am against exploitation of the Global South. The point however is to eliminate this exploitation and keeping these programs that assists those that are disabled and unemployed.

    did the mamdani thing set you off ? genuinely because youre my comrade and i want to understand

    I am on welfare and disabled. Every day i fear that the fascists will kick down my door and kill me. Where i live, the fascists are setting up people like me as a scapegoat and i just cant allow that to happen..

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

    I apologize if you are not against welfare programs, but when people talk about the "welfare state" they are indeed talking about those programs.

    An example, when reactionaries complain about the "welfare state" they are complaining about social assistance given to the poor and to those disabled and unemployed.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [+] -6 points 16 hours ago* (5 children)

    Just because someone said something in another post that you don’t like does not justify being rude to them in another post

    Yes it does. I have the right to defend myself against those who wish to harm me.

    Also, "I think letting people who are disabled die is good" cannot be reduced to just an opinion i don't like.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [+] -11 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (11 children)

    doesnt welfare state as we know it today basically prevent revolution. communism is unpopular in northern europe, japan etc. because nobody cares for strugle and fighting when you have it relatively well. this is why mamdami is not good, we dont need you to be comfortable in your imperialist nations…

    You just said this in my thread about welfare. So don't lie and pretend you care about people who are neurodivergents and others who are disabled.

    On giving this further thought, my accusation here was premature and I apologize.

  • source
  • [–] [S] 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

    The last line claims that “israel” occupies the country of Palestine. I disagree with that line and I would replace the term country with land. The first line is “’Israel’ isn’t a country?” is likewise wrong. In this case, I would replace country with state. That’s all I have to say about your pedantry.

    Actually, no you kinda have a point. I can see how the meme is wrong even when I change it with my own terms and using Lenin’s definition of the state. Ehh whatever I guess

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] 11 points 2 days ago

    This does not however mean voting for bourgeois parties just because they promise welfare state concessions. Building an independent socialist political movement that does not subordinate itself to bourgeois liberalism is not mutually exclusive with continuing to advocate for the protection and expansion of worker rights and social welfare.

    Yeah I understand that. But groups such as the American Communist Party and the Swedish Örebro Party are both pretending to be revolutionary and left-wing, but they also advocate for a conflict between workers and people who happens to be on welfare. My fear is that this crap will mix with a genuine critique of how the welfare system and these benefits are maintained largely through imperialism. So we are witnessing a growing trend here whereby Western workers are told that both “welfarism” and imperialism are bad for them. But this is petty bourgeois consciousness, not proletariat consciousness. These false (read fascist) revolutionary parties will gain momentum as the workers’ cost of living worsen. That’s why I believe all real revolutionaries must explicitly advocate for social benefits and a complete stop to the military industrial complex, and protecting the former and attacking the latter by means of violence.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    I will personally not say much about this and simply refer to what Domenico Losurdo said in an interview. In 2016, Losurdo was interviewed to discuss two books written by him, Class Struggle and the Absent Left.

    At the end of the interview, Losurdo says, “I see no contradiction between the commitment to ‘the Reconstruction of the Communist Party’ and the wish and encouragement for the recovery of the left in our country (and in the West more generally). Once you get past the binary reading of social conflict, you can understand very well the existence of forces that, while not subscribing in any way to the communist program of overthrowing the capitalist-imperialist order, are fighting for the defense of the welfare state and for a politics of peace. On the contrary, it was authors such as Bobbio who believed that the overthrow of the “socialist camp” in Eastern Europe and the dissolution of communist parties in the West would give impetus to the Western left, finally freed from the lead in its wings. As is well known, the opposite happened. The Absent Left draws attention to this. In this regard, the book specifies that the recovery of the left in the West implies not only the fight against the dismantling of the welfare state, but also against wars whose neo-colonial character and catastrophic consequences are now clear to everyone.”

    Link to the interview

    view more: next ›