AK_Throwaway

joined 2 years ago
[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Good News! Alaska figured out the best way to do it:

https://public.courts.alaska.gov/web/forms/docs/pub-28.pdf

TLDR: A merit based process where candidates are rated by whomever wants to take the time to rate them (mostly lawyers), then a round of interviews with a judicial council (made up of three members of the public and three members of the Bar), judicial council considers scores and interview performance, eliminates lacking candidates (Chief Justice of the Alaska Supreme Court is tiebreaker if council is split on whether to eliminate a candidate), then advances remaining names to the governor who must pick one of the remaining candidates unless there are less than three candidates, in which case the process starts all over. Appointed judges have to face retention elections every few years, where their name is literally put on the November ballot and if they get less that 50% approval they get removed. This applies to all appointed judges, even those on the appellate courts.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They used r*tard in common conversation...

๐Ÿ˜•

EDIT: But they must have read my face and stopped saying it.

[โ€“] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

But he was a pillar of the community who carved wood!?

 

Federation - blech

 

They declawed their cat. They are confused about showing kindness to the homeless. They like pop country.

Any hope here?