My next post will probably be a "Coming Soon!" page on itch.io. Right now I'm just interested in a vibe check on this screenshot. Regarding my previous thread on mountains vs ridges, I've decided that I'm still interested in ridges, but for complexity reasons I've deferred it for a post-release update or worse, a possible sequel.

 

Hey, I’m curious about people's thoughts on how different games handle terrain in turn-based strategy games like Advance Wars 2 and Fire Emblem. Some use simple mountain tiles, while others have ridges or more complex tile elevation. Do you have any thoughts or preferences on which approach you enjoy more, or how it affects gameplay?

Here are several random screenshots:

Advanced Wars 2 (mountain tiles)

Red Alert (ridges are basically just walls, no elevation)

Red Alert 2 (ridges, elevation)

I guess in RA2 you can have elevated bridges, boats go under bridges, which is a cool concept not all games support.

Into the Breach (mountain tiles, afaik no elevation)

Fire Emblem (mountain tiles)

I've been working on my first game for a few months now, I'm almost to a point where I'll have to commit to one style or the other. In 1 to 6 months I'm hoping to have screenshots firing at full capacity, just need to have my bare minimum placeholders do a little trick called existing.

And honesty, any completely unrelated (to mountains/ ridges/elevation) game design ideas/questions are also welcome.

[–] 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

sure, but I think I'm not into the fast paced games because I'm getting old, but I also don't like the trend in general. I think there's an untapped market for good turn based strategy games, which I'm currently working on a crappy indie game to address.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago*

    I'm a bit of a fence sitter on the actual issue, I love F-Droid as is and fear change, but I'll say as someone who thinks they'll release on Google Play in the general future, the thing that pisses me off most about Google Play is they have a "repetitive content policy" which disincentivizes you from releasing a full paid app and a demo app. The main issue is, I don't want my app to categorize as "in-app purchases" if the only purchase is the "unlock full version", because that doesn't distinguish my app from any unethical whale-hunting casino-for-children microtransaction apps, and I don't want my app to claim to be free if it's just a demo.

    At least, from a pro-user, communicate everything clearly, perspective, I feel that Google is compelling devs to dark-pattern-by-default on this subject.

    LMK if I'm wrong about any of that.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    just imagine living in a socialist utopia where Dawn of War Soulstorm is open source, getting regular updates like graphics updates, optimizations, native support MacOS and linux, ARM builds, new campaigns added regularly, new game modes, an optional hybrid LoL/DotA game mode...

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    my advanced age

    I think there was a time when turn-based gameplay was popular because it wasn't as hardware-intensive

    That's interesting, my initial choice of turn-based gameplay is mostly 2 things: It's a lot easier to offer an experience that respects your PC/phone's battery, such as less animations between user actions, or maybe even just offering an option in settings to reduce idle animations. I'm dabbling into 3D, which I've not committed either way, but might make this detail harder.

    Also, I am getting older, and finding myself less able to sit at a computer and play a "live action" game, or online games that can't be paused, or online games that require a commitment of 30 to 60 uninterrupted minutes, or schedule specific times to game with my friends. And these are often caused by reasons like "job" or "family", but maybe soon there will be reasons like "My old non-gaming mouse and arthritis can't out-micro this diamond league starcraft player."

    What's absolutely crazy to me, is that a lot of turn based games I've seen still require a commitment of 30 to 60 uninterrupted minutes to play. Probably the most important core design detail of my game is the ability to play turns, even partial turns, progressively throughout a day/week on the player's own schedule. I plan on supporting both "live" games and asynchronous games.

    Anyways, thanks for your thoughts!

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Turn-based - This one is hard for me to admit because I’ve played lots of great turn-based games and will inevitably play more of them, but for some reason when turn-based is a key feature, my brain interprets it as being a low-budget and/or low-effort game, or that the gameplay won’t match how the game is presented. It’s not that I dislike the concept of turn-based play, but when I see “turn-based” in a description I just glaze over.

    I'm working on a turn based game, you could say it's low budget, perhaps more accurately, no-budget. Does your glaze over system offer leniency for games that are clearly indie+cheap, or maybe you intended this for games with huge marketing budgets and have microtransactions? Either way, I'd love any specific interests/thoughts you have on the turn based games genre in general.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    My engine is homemade, I'm focusing primarily on perfecting networking/server stuff in a way that would make the "what if I lost internet/what if I don't want to play online every" people happy. My prototype is 2d placeholders. I plan on doing some experiments with 3D before deciding to go all-in on an art style or 2D vs 3D. I currently do not have any music or sound effect assets. I haven't published anything yet, but to oversimplify, pretend that I'm making an Advanced Wars 2 clone.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I would absolutely to love to have any of those with access to paid gamedev assets, as I've not bought any, or acquired any that were temporarily free, and will be relatively poor until after I win the gamedev lottery.

    I'm not using Unity tho, so if any of those are vendor-locked to Unity (license or otherwise), maybe the next person should take those.

  • source
  • view more: next ›