Four German military officials discussed what targets German-made Taurus missiles could potentially hit if Chancellor Olaf Scholz ever allowed them to be sent to Kyiv, and the call had been intercepted by Russian intelligence.

According to German authorities, the "data leak" was down to just one participant dialling in on an insecure line, either via his mobile or the hotel wi-fi.

The exact mode of dial-in is "still being clarified", Germany has said.

"I think that's a good lesson for everybody: never use hotel internet if you want to do a secure call," Germany's ambassador to the UK, Miguel Berger, told the BBC this week. Some may feel the advice came a little too late.

Eyebrows were raised when it emerged the call happened on the widely-used WebEx platform - but Berlin has insisted the officials used an especially secure, certified version.

Professor Alan Woodward from the Surrey Centre for Cyber Security says that WebEx does provide end-to-end encryption "if you use the app itself".

But using a landline or open hotel wi-fi could mean security was no longer guaranteed - and Russian spies, it's now supposed, were ready to pounce.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 143 points 2 years ago* (5 children)

This doesnt add up... If the software was properly encrypted they shouldn't have been able to carry out a man in the middle attack right?

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 94 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Maybe he dialed in by telephone? It would be a complete boomer move, but I’ve seen people do it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 85 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    A researcher in cryptography in Berlin, Henning Seidler, believes the most likely theory is that the officer dialled in via his mobile phone and the call was picked up by spies' antenna who can also "forward" the traffic onto the main, official antenna.

    Seems like the more likely theory

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago* (6 children)

    That is an expensive way to lose your job!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    "Intelligence" services cost taxpayers billions a year, so the billion dollar question is why is it possible to dial in to "official" military communications over insecure channels at all?

    Why doesn't the government run their own signal or matrix infra? Why are they paying Cisco, and introducing the numerous attack vectors of a proprietary optionally-encrypted service?

    The threat of surveillance capitalism isn't just in the dragnet surveillance of the population. It's in the profiteering of "partnerships" between private and public — the drive of corrupt and incompetent political and military leadership to direct funds to sub-optimal proprietary services and protocols, instead of leveraging public funding to contribute to open-source and make hardened systems ubiquitous.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    The funny thing is, that the Bundeswehr actually has a communications platform based on Matrix: bwMessenger goes live for Bundeswehr, element.io

    Why they're not using it? Who knows...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago

    That's what I'm getting at. This ultimately isn't the fault of some technobozo who dialled in from hotel wifi. If the system were fit for purpose, technobozo could dial in over any network.

    The is the fault of German politicians, military, and "intelligence". This type of compromise should not exist as a matter of circumstance. It should only be possible when an end users device is directly compromised.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    yes, one side has to automatically or manually accept a fake certificate/key to MITM end to end encryption. you know, like when your browser says "certificate error" and you click on advanced->accept anyway or something like that. if the software always accepts or he manually accepted one, the MITM guy can substitute his own encryption key/cert and decrypt and re-encrypt on the fly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    If you're looking at who is allowed to issue trusted root certificates in common browsers and operating systems, nobody needs to accept nothing to have every possible man in the middle from every major country's intelligence services already in there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    But that also depends on the issuer that WebEx used. If this really was a MITM without someone fucking up and bypassing a warning, whoever the root CA is issuing for WebEx can no longer be trusted.

    More likely they dialed in via mobile rather than use “Computer Audio” and that is easily defeated using a Stingray-type device.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    It's always one of two possibilities: shit software or idiot users

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago*

    In this case shit software. For a secure conference software there should be no possibility for the user to accept invalid certificates.

    The developer always has to plan with what we call a DAU in germany (Dümmster anzunehmender User = dumbest user possible), and even that user should have no possibility to accidentally share a secure conference. So as a developer I would: Lock the user to certificates and encryption keys I deem secure and hook into the low level OS functions to grab the screen and disable them to prevent accidental sharing via software like Anydesk and the like which the user forgot to close. This would even interrupt the functions of a simple trojan on the PC.

    Of course a dedicated attacker with physical or admin access to the device could always break these. But then you have another big security breach.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 68 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Yeah blame it on hotel internet, not their shitty communication service that's not encrypted.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 62 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    "I think that's a good lesson for everybody: never use hotel internet if you want to do a secure call," Germany's ambassador to the UK, Miguel Berger, told the BBC this week.

    The exact mode of dial-in is "still being clarified", Germany has said.

    OK, well the exact mode kinda fucking matters before you just scapegoat a hotel.

    This smells like a coverup.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 46 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    In a world where I can deploy end to end encrypted comms servers to an old computer in my house, the fucking military of any country should, at a minimum, require encryption to join meetings where military strategy is being discussed.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 46 points 2 years ago

    End to end encryption

    USE IT

  • source
  • [–] 44 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    They can discuss missile targets but they don't know how to set a secure comm channel, it makes me wonder... how old were they? why don't they give a device with pre-installed VPN (incl. Killswitch) to all certain-rank officials and get done with this?...

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    They do. Its much more than a built in vpn, they also have specialized, hardened versions of communications apps on them. The weakest link in cybersecurity is usually the end user.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    I think one issue is for high officials that outrank everyone, they can get away with getting an insecure device because they prefer an iPhone over the custom hardened phone on Android 10 locked down for secure reasons.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 38 points 2 years ago

    an especially secure, certified version

    Bwahahahahahhahahahhahahhaa

  • source
  • [–] 33 points 2 years ago

    This happened because of an unintended backdoor into an end to end encrypted conversation.

    The British Government are actively trying to get back doors put into end to end encryption by law.

    They are doing this so they can spy on their own citizens to ostensibly make Britain safer.

    But as you can see, it actually would make it less safe.

  • source
  • [–] 32 points 2 years ago

    This is what happens without E2EE.

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    What an amazing feat of incompetence! They’d be better off just using Signal

    They’d be quantum proof as well 😅 https://signal.org/blog/pqxdh/

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 19 points 2 years ago

    I don't see how it matters if you use hotel WiFi or mobile if the mobile mast you connect to is controlled by a hostile government.

    What matters is what you were sending wasn't secured at source.

    Although Wikipedia tells you the range and I'm pretty sure even Russia have access to maps and a compass.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    How is it possible to accomplish a man in the middle attack on a TLS secure connection ? Hotel wifi or not, unless something major like Singaporean gov interfered with the connection, forced forged certificates into his phone, I don't see how this was put off by compromising the connection .

    I bet they are covering for the Fact that one of them has downloaded malware into his device to masturbate to a hot girl living next to him kinda ad. and then malware shared back that data to Russia. or they have a spy among them and Germany isn't ready to admit having its defense forces compromised with Russian assets.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    It is fine if you use unprotected wifi and then connect to a VPN.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    These VPN ad campaigns are incredibly detrimental to people's understanding of security mechanisms in the internet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Isn't like very basic security advice to not use random connections for sensitive information? But than again it's Germany, pretty sure he has his password written down on a sticky note.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago*

    EvE Online should be mandatory training for anyone with a security clearance. Minimum of six months in Goonswarm, Pandemic Horde, Fraternity, or The Initiative.

    https://cad-comic.com/comic/one-of-us/

    That's only a slight exaggeration. I had a "chat" with one of our intel officers at one point due to a IRL purchase of PLEX.

    Edit: maybe just Goonswarm. They do the intelligence and spy stuff the best.

  • source
  • [–] [B] 6 points 2 years ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    He sounds relaxed on the line as he chats with two colleagues about the "mega" view from his room, and how he's just come back from a drink at a nearby hotel where there's an incredible swimming pool.

    Over the next 40 minutes, the group appear to touch upon highly sensitive military issues, including the ongoing debate over whether Germany should send Taurus cruise missiles to Ukraine.

    The four participants discussed what targets German-made Taurus missiles could potentially hit if Chancellor Olaf Scholz ever allowed them to be sent to Kyiv - a contentious issue in Germany.

    "You have to choose a certain kind of disguise for this disaster," says Mr Kiesewetter, who's also worked at the Nato military alliance and is a member of Germany's opposition conservative CDU party.

    But German government figures find suggestions that they are somehow soft on Russia increasingly irritating, particularly because Berlin has donated more weapons aid to Ukraine than any other nation in Europe.

    It's further exposed domestic divisions about whether to send Taurus missiles to Ukraine and prompted a wider discussion about the country's perceived defence and security weaknesses.


    The original article contains 1,075 words, the summary contains 187 words. Saved 83%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    Bad article

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›