cross-posted from: https://lemmygrad.ml/post/3768443

Researchers estimate that each additional centimeter of height is associated with a 1.30% increase in annual income.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/traversmark/2020/04/16/your-height-has-a-big-impact-on-your-salary-new-research-seeks-to-understand-why/

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 69 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

i wonder about confounding variables like childhood nutrition. in a study like this height may actually be a proxy for socioeconomic status.

edit: and if i'd bothered to read the article i'd have noticed it said exactly that:

Instead, the authors favor an “early environment” explanation, such that people who grow up in healthy, constructive environments become taller, smarter, and more successful than those who grow up in impoverished, destructive environments.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago*

    Someone here posted a study of contemporary stats of colonized countries in Asia (particularly India, I believe). It found that the stagnation and even decrease in height correlated with colonization and imperialism since much of the nutritional resources were being redirected elsewhere. The stereotype of Asians being short is largely the cause of crackers in many Asian countries

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 52 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 44 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Median income in US: $74580

    Median height in US: 175cm (5'9")

    Jeff Bezos's income in 2023: $70 billion

    Jeff Bezos's estimated height: 530cm (17'4")

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Yet here I am: 6'7" and can't find a job angry-hex

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 2 years ago

    Time to wear absurdly long stilts so I'll be a billionaire

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago

    actually it's just guys named Kyle

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I think of it as a little bonus earned by crying myself to sleep from growing pains

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago

    Don't forget that constant little twinge in the back when you're older from a lifetime of slight bending because tabletops, sinks, and other everyday designs are all just a few inches out of reach.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    I may be 6'1 but I am unemployed and unemployable

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago

    people take taller people more seriously, associate them with leadership when maybe it's not warranted. it's not an accident that the vast majority of CEOs and practically every president is >6' and so many lie about their height or wear lifts or whatever.

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    we need a tall guy tax and short guy reparations but nobody gives a shit because they either have bigger legitimate problems (racism, misogyny, etc) or they want to be andrew tate.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    this is super funny to me, a short person who can't reach the top shelves of her cabinets

    In defense of tall dudes like my husband, they're already paying a Personal Comfort tax: they're constantly bonking their heads into things, and their legs don't fit anywhere.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago

    I am 5'6'' (168cm). Now I know why I cannot find a job.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago

    when the ridiculous aliens in Invader Zim have a more consistent society

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    Importantly, this estimation assumes other factors associated with earning potential — for instance, gender, age, years of schooling, and location — are held equal.

    See, the gender/pay gap is a myth! It's a height/pay gap!

    Academia is a fucking joke

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago* (7 children)

    Huh? This is saying that a height-pay-gap exists in the absence of other variables (like a possible gender gap), not that there is no gender gap.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    What does it mean that the other factors are held equal? If difference is negated doesn't that skew the results? I guess I don't understand the study

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    You want to study the effect of a certain trait on a group. So you take two groups and try to make them as even as possible, aside from the trait you are testing. Ideally you'd match every guy in your sample with someone who is mostly identical in upbringing, location, etc, but taller. That's how you make sure it's actually height causing the effect and not something else. If you don't account for this, you might end up with a bunch of bourgeois short kings getting compared to 6 foot tall poor people, and might even come the conclusion that height has a negative correlation with wealth.

    It's not saying "height matters, not those other things." But rather "height is one of those things that effect socioeconomic status, statistically."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago

    Jokes and incel catastrophizing aside, lookism is indeed a thing with material consequences in society. People just like conventionally-attractive people more and that leads to preferential treatment.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago

    Maybe the gender pay gap was actually the height pay gap all along

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago

    Barron Trump gonna be ballin'

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    Damn Brace really is rich

  • source
  • [+] 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago

    Lol another reason why the most I've ever made is like 10k a year.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago*

    5' 10(.5)" and don't make ish...

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    Making $189,000 a year is my 9'11"

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    The most oppressed group society is manlets.

    In case you really couldn't tell.../s

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    This explains John Fetterman

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    Those guys are both just Lieutenant Commander Andy Billups. Since he lives in a post-scarcity communist society, he has no need of a salary, whatever his height.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    Forbes is incel propaganda

  • source
  • [–] [S] 3 points 2 years ago
    load more comments
    view more: next ›