Companies knew for decades recycling was not viable but promoted it regar

all 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 13 points 2 years ago*

Reduce ---> The most important thing to do.

Re-use ---> Second-most important thing you can do.

Recycle ---> Literally scraping the bottom of the barrel in terms of effectiveness of reducing pollution.


There is absolutely a reason corporations honed in on the least effective of the three and tossed the other two out the fucking window. First two don't jive with a consumer market filled with Planned Obsolescence.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago*

    No, plastics producers knew "recycling cannot go on indefinitely". So did anyone else who spent a few moments thinking about it.

    The same is true of paper recycling or even trying to reuse non-disposable goods. Nothing lasts forever.

    That doesn't mean recycling is not a "real" solution. There is real value in "prolonging the time until an item is disposed of". Otherwise why bother to exercise and eat healthy - after all that only prolongs the time until you die.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    John Oliver did a fantastic NSFW bit on this:

    https://youtu.be/Fiu9GSOmt8E

  • source