top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 84 points 2 years ago (71 children)

In a nutshell if anything breaks you are screwed ;D

  • source
  • hideshow 71 child comments
  • [–] 132 points 2 years ago* (64 children)

    It's an Apple device, what did you expect?
    The thing even has an external battery pack, and instead of using USB-C so you could use any power bank you already own, they designed a completely new proprietary connector. In 2024.
    Who the fuck does that anymore, except Apple?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 64 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago* (15 children)

    I can see the argument for having a connector that can’t be pulled out: if you were crossing a busy street or walking down a stairway with one of these strapped to your head and the cable came out, you’d be instantly blind.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 53 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    Who the fuck wears a VR headset walking in the street, let alone crossing a road?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (47 replies)
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 68 points 2 years ago (33 children)

    Just think about it for a moment. Apple made a mask, that when you wear it in your face, projects a 3D animated avatar if you face on the outside. That is so weird, f’ed up and dystopian.

  • source
  • hideshow 33 child comments
  • [–] 75 points 2 years ago* (15 children)

    I won’t argue about whether this is dystopian, but the practical reason for the face projection is that they wanted to make this not just something you wear sitting alone in your basement, like most other VR headsets. They wanted it to be usable around other people, at a workplace, with family, etc.

    Interacting with someone wearing a full face blind is just weird, so they thought that making the eyes visible would help make this a bit more socially usable.

    I’m not sure that’s really going to work out — seems at least as awkward as Google’s failed Glass project — but Apple’s design decision has some merit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago* (4 children)

    Google Glass really feels smarter in this particular regard.

    Also they decided to stuff everything into the headset.

    Maybe making it a separate thing and moving as much mass and volume as possible to something worn on your belt or your back would be a better idea. EDIT: But I do understand how this doesn't fit their marketing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (7 replies)
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    I don't know, I could see the value if it really looked like the mask was semi transparent.

    So it's a cool idea, the only problem is that they didn't deliver and the result is creepy instead.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I don’t think I can agree with this.

    The face projection was likely an afterthought. They were already deep into the 3D face scan into avatar world with things like continuity camera and lidar. Granted, I don’t believe they are currently able to reposition the face into a completely different angle (top down into forward facing) with continuity camera, but that’s where their tech was going anyway. And they wanted to be able to have user facial expressions in device regardless.

    All they did in this case was slap a screen on the front and display the avatar the thing is already generating, then call it a feature and upcharge with a 1000% markup on the total cost.

    It’s a gimmick, that’s all it ever was. Meant to make this look like a sleeker device than it is with some clever marketing.

    Not dystopian, just disappointing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    That is so weird, f’ed up and dystopian.

    It's not as weird as the Meta Quest, where you literally have no idea wether the person wearing it is looking at you or not.

    The view of someone's eyes is very low quality - I'll give you that. But it's better than nothing at all. And I'm not sure they could've done better without doubling the price of the product.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 42 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    The example video of showing wearing the headset and showing the outer display:

    https://valkyrie.cdn.ifixit.com/media/2024/02/03103510/Display-Stack_sm.mp4

    It is off putting and reminds me of one of the Robocop 2 Prototypes.

    https://www.robocoparchive.com/info/prototypes.htm

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 20 points 2 years ago (3 children)
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›