267
Vision Pro Teardown—Why Those Fake Eyes Look So Weird (www.ifixit.com)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
152 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 53 points 2 years ago (9 children)

Who the fuck wears a VR headset walking in the street, let alone crossing a road?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [+] -7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    That is what the AR aspect of this headset is all about. It's AR first VR second.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Actually I would argue it is VR first and AR second because in its dormant, non-powered state your view is completely blocked whereas if it were AR first you would just be looking through transparent glass lenses in its dormant, non-powered state.

    Apple’s final destination with this product is AR and they are using it as AR but it is a VR headset replicating an AR experience because we do not have the technology yet to make something like this being AR dominant.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago

    I say AR because they do full video passthrough first and have their UIs try to look a part of the real life environment (shadow effects on irl objects, menus are all semitransparent, etc).

    You have to choose to do immersion instead, even the dorky eyes are implied to make it useful in IRL settings.

    Not everything is good (the eyes are a total miss, the avatars are uncanny).

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent