top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 83 points 2 years ago (4 children)
  • [–] 45 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    If Microsoft wants more RAM just to do AI shit on my computer, I'd rather have even less just to make sure they cant.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 42 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    My next OS will be some kind of Linux. I just had to reinstall Windows 11 because it corrupted it's install after some time. I had to uninstall so much crap and regedit so many thinks just to get it back to where I was before. I don't want Bing search in my windows search results. I don't want your stupid widgets and I don't want your browser or 90% of your default apps. And no I don't want office 360 or onedrive. So stop forcing it into my face. When Linux gets Plasma 6 and HDR support there is only holding me back my Nvidia GPUs Linux compatibility. While I hah to install windows 11 again I played a lot of games on my Steam Deck! It's is awesome and only some games with obscure anti cheat don't run. (well some times they don't run on windows too)

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 40 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    I love to bash MS, but this feels like an industry-wide trend to /never/ care about optimizing beyond the bar of "typical specs of new devices in rich countries". I'm guessing it's just to limit labor costs, and computers are less-rapidly-improving than the 90s/00s?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Code optimization has pretty much fallen by the way side since ram prices keep going down and cpu performance keeps improving.

    Why spend the time if you don't have to?

    Browsers are some of the worst culprits.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago

    Browser canvas is one of the worst culprits: it has to keep a buffer with an uncompressed bitmap several screens in size.

    Old browsers used to keep a single screen worth of canvas buffer, then redraw stuff as you scrolled... which made it a horrible experience. You can still find some of that with "clever" web designs where they replace fonts or move things dynamically as you scroll.

    Then you have websites with "infinite scroll" that just keep increasing the canvas buffer size more and more and more, to infinity and beyond... and people wonder why their Facebook or Reddit tabs use so much RAM.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 33 points 2 years ago (25 children)

    It already should have that. 8 GB is the absolute bare fucking minimum for most computers these days, but unless you have 16, it's a generally unpleasant experience.

  • source
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    For windows, yes. For Linux and OSx, 8gb si still ok for most usecase

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    8 GB is the absolute bare fucking minimum for most computers these days

    I keep seeing this statement all around the web but it is still amazing that we need that much RAM even for today.

    Don't get me wrong, I know 8 GB is becoming the standard even for mobile phones, so it is only logical to assume to bump this number for PCs (why no 12 GBS of RAM? IDK) and I have been using 16 GBs of RAM for 10 years now, it is a MacBook Pro and for me Apple does not make it clear to see how much of that RAM I'm actually using... Regardless RAM has never been a problem for me, with casual usage, and I always thought 8 GBs should work the same for even a lighter usage, why do I say that? Because before moving to such a Mac I used a laptop with 4 GBs of RAM around 2011-2014 and it was a pain in the ass to use (the processor was shit as well) for simple navigation for my thesis... So yeah if you think 8 GBs is bad, try 4 GBs.

    Another reason I think 8 GBs is "a high amount for casual usage" is that my work PC had also 4 GBs of RAM, but there was not a reason to hoard tabs and such, so it was very manageable (also the processor wasn't shit, but it was like a Core i5 or something like that, the usual office PCs you see and know), if we are talking about bottlenecks it would be the shitty HDD speeds LMAO.

    What I think you guys all mean with 8 GBs of RAM is the bare minimum for nowadays standard is if you use it for IT related topics or you like to hoard stuff in it (which ain't bad, unused RAM is wasted RAM after all) or simply depend on heavy programs which ain't the web browser, for casuals I'd say 6 GBs would be a fair number, although it is not usual, and fuck 4 GBs of RAM in 2024, for any kind of device lol (I bet offices still use that dog shit).

    Anyway I'd personally aim for 16 GBs of RAM or more regardless, for any of my future purchases, because I like to keep my stuff for years to come.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 27 points 2 years ago*

    I do have 16GB RAM, but that's not because I wanted to run just the OS and without a game.

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    linux needs like 1gb of ram and some distros even less

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    Strictly speaking, "Linux" can run on 10MB of RAM or less.

    Meanwhile, a single web page may need 100MB or more to build the DOM, run all scripts, and keep a buffer of the canvas.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    My new PC has 64g ram. But I'm also not using or plan to use windows. Checkmate M$!

    But in all seriousness, 8g is like, the foundational minimum these days. Sad tbh. Browsers are so bloated these days. I'm surprised that browsers haven't become their own OS yet. It kinda feels that way in some environments.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    Microsoft are such weirdos. It's like they're trying to empower Google, who will lap up all of the users they abandon as they install Chrome OS, because let's be honest, the average Jo seldom just installs Linux, so they'll say, "oh I've heard of Chrome, let me try that"

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 19 points 2 years ago (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 19 points 2 years ago

    I may have 128Gb in my current rig (Dell Precision T7610), but if this is the way you’re gonna be bloating Windows 12, imma gonna be running to OpenSUSE or some BSD.

    Yes, I use Win10Privacy to lobotomize all of the spyware and cruftware that comes with Windows. But it’s gotta be re-run after every significant Windows update.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago

    My next Windows PC doesn't need any RAM, because I'm not going to need one.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    Oh no! I won't be able to run Windows on my new MacBook Pro!

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Another reason to move to Linux ;P

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children)

    Jesus Christ, what are they doing? Emulating the OS in fucking Minecraft!?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    The article mentions AI. 16gigs feels far too little to run a LLM of respectable size so I wonder what exactly this means? Feels like no one is gonna be happy about a 16gig LLM (high RAM usage and bad AI features)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 12 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Don't worry! Eventually, they will find a "cure," such as Windows moving to a cloud-only model where your PC becomes a glorified dumb terminal!

    So like Windows 365, but for consumers.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • That's probably not the worst option for most consumers. People are horrible about keeping their shit updated.

    Most people only use their computers for web browsing anyways, and many people buy systems that are way more powerful than what they actually need. I've had to talk a ton of people out of buying i7 laptops just for Office and the internet.

    I've built and maintained Citrix VDI environments for a global company, and once people get over the "this is new" hurdle, they love it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Meanwhile, chrome and desktop apps (Electron-based) like Slack, note apps, etc, takes 1GB just to open... Well, tbh I don't know if they really use physical RAM space, but anyway.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 11 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I will have no next windows PC anyways. I'll go out of my way to get one without a windows license, to put linux onto it :)

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    Going to need 32 GB of RAM or more plus a GPU with 48 GB of VRAM just to run Win12 w/ AI subsystem so you have enough headroom to run a program or two

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    my first computer was a tandy sensation which has 4mb of ram and a 100mb hard drive

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    RAM is cheap, and even if you're just doing absolute basic shit your current PC will work better with 16GB of RAM (also looking at you here, Apple). If it's not a phone you're buying don't get anything with less than 16GB.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›