That's 100% intentional.

Hire less workers to cut costs, and squeeze as much profit as possible from what few workers there are.

Less free time and higher employee turnover also means it's harder to unionize, which is definitely a plus for CEOs.

Exactly the same as the store i worked at. No money to have more people scheduled in, plenty of money to ask for OT and call extra people in daily.

Before I quit there had not been a single day in half a year where the evening shift had enough people scheduled to do the amount of work we knew was going to be there. Not a single day the managers didn't have to beg for more people to come in. So when my options came down to become a manager or leave when my contract expired, I bolted.

I'm a software developer and my company flat out refuses to hire graduates (if they didn't work as students here) or offer apprenticeships, even though apprenticeships are a great way to basically produce your own developers.

At the same time, there's a constant staff shortage basically everywhere and we even have to refuse projects because we can't staff them.

I used to work at Taco Bell and the manager that hired me got fired for scheduling one "extra" person a shift. Every other metric was great, of course.

The game

Should have made the hog laying down in the last panel for loss

Damn, it's pretty crazy how far we've come considering how nobody has wanted to work anymore for over a century

Motherf

Came to the comments specifically to see if anyone else noticed it. Glad to see it wasn’t just me.

Idk cause just about everytime I have a lacking customer experience it's usually directly because the place is understaffed

Food took too long, waited a while for someone to give me a service, the cleaning looks half asses, and etc

It's all usually due to being understaffed and the staff is exhausted and doing everything they need to do in a little time as possible

Looks like a boar or warthog, to me.

Curriculum vitae

I think it's a type of honda

Depending on what country you're in, it's either a resumé, or a supplement to a resumé that summarizes academic achievements for an applicant with a graduate degree.

105

Curriculum vitae. It’s basically a long résumé. The résumé gets your foot in the door with the “best of” highlights that are tailored to the specific job. The the CV is what you bring to the interview; It’s longer and has a more complete work history, instead of just the bits that are relevant to the job you applied for.

So when they ask you “can you explain this gap in your employment for these two years” you can go “yeah, if you look at my CV, you’ll see that I was working/freelance in a tangental industry. But it wasn’t very pertinent to this application, so I left it off of my résumé when I applied.”

And for tailoring your résumé to each job, you just copy/paste the relevant info from your CV to make a one page document.

A 2CV was an awesome Citroên car.

It's what Brits (and maybe others) often call a resume. It's also sometimes slightly longer. than a resume (2+ pages instead of 1).