I just install Reddit official app to see watch they offer. And holy cow. They are selling NFT-like stuff.

Instead make a better app, they give use this.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 127 points 3 years ago* (11 children)

I never knew about this and, as others said, they may have been doing this for a while, but I'd say OP still has a point when they said:

Instead make a better app, they give use this.

This is the sort of thing they work on instead of their shit app. They've had years to improve that app. Longer than NFTs.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    They want everyone to use their shitty app so yours forced to see the avatars of other posters, thus subliminally making you want an avatar to "fit in"

    When I used infinity all you saw was the username of who made a post or comment, and the content they posted itself. You don't need avatars for reddit, its an anonymous website(for now)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago

    So many companies do this. Attempting to get quick sales boosts quarter by quarter while avoiding doing anything sustainable because it doesn’t generate instant profit. It’s one of the worst effects of the investor-first way of doing business

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 88 points 3 years ago (9 children)

    Didn't they already long sell NFT avatars?

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    They did pretty much since nfts exploded in popularity.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 39 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I think I just got cancer from looking at that screenshot

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 32 points 3 years ago* (last edited 7 months ago)
    [–] 32 points 3 years ago

    Weren't nft avatars being sold for like months now? I remember them being cyberbullied and banned on mass from 196 (which is extremely funny if you ask me)

  • source
  • [–] 29 points 3 years ago

    They already did such thing with the avatars ( they were buyable and "Marked" as nfts )

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 3 years ago

    It takes a special kind of stupid to spend money on these....

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    If you don't think of it in the context of Reddit's bullshit, the idea of having special avatars that you have to pay for as a form of monetization isn't the worst thing imo. As long as it doesn't negatively affect users and isn't on top of other predatory forms of monetization.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 19 points 3 years ago*

    Not news. They already did since nfts exploded in popularity. Also they did give away free avatar nfts since then for some events.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    It's like they are trying to get rid of users. I had seen the nft on the browser version ages ago but all of this is the reason why we preferred 3rd party browsing experience. Instead of fixing reddit they took that away

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 3 years ago*

    Yeah I looked at this screenshot and thought, I don't know who their target market is, but it's clearly not me.

    Makes sense they would actively try to drive us away, so all their bandwidth is going to whoever the hell would give them money for these ugly pictures.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 3 years ago*

    This is like their 4th collection, selling them for a while. Crypto Twitter doesn't care about them.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Love lemmy for being able to turn off avatars.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 3 years ago (3 children)
  • [–] 11 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

    Those nft avatars are cringe

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 3 years ago*

    On Lemmy all the avatars are free.

    Nobody better copy the sloth or I'll be real mad.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago (7 children)

    My theory is Musk is trying to bankrupt Twitter quickly so he can minimise his losses, after his impulsive ego finally had some consequences. I think Huffman thinks Musk is a genius and is trying to emulate him by pivoting into crypto, to create his own PayPal style pay day.

    I also don't think he's going to be able to create the perpetual motion money machine he's expecting, but it's not like he's going to go personally bankrupt trying. Graphic artists are a cheap labor business expense compared to the potential gain, and at worst you get your own marketplace out of it.

    It would be easy enough to launder cash through such a system that he'll probably make more money than most will ever own in their lifetime. Even if 99% of it is only ever traded for less than a dollar.

    The question I have is whether he's competent to keep enough users for a long enough time to buy a personal fortified island or just a personal apocalypse fort.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Graphic artists are a cheap labor business expense compared to the potential gain, and at worst you get your own marketplace out of it.

    And I wonder if they are even using graphic artists or if they’re using AI generated images.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 8 points 3 years ago

    They've been doing it a while. They even gave some free ones away to encourage people to buy more. I actually have some of the free ones because why not. I would never pay for them though

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 3 years ago*

    I thought they discontinued this?

    How do I crosspost this to !fucknfts?

    -sent via Thunder for Lemmy

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago

    opens trenchcoat hey, I got some of those copy & pasted nft pics for cheap. you in?

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    I didn't know about this either. I still cant believe people fall for that nonsense.

    I guess I did buy a bunch of skins in rocket league, is that any different than an nft? I just really like how the cars look lol

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (5 children)

    It’s quite different, and your purchase seems more sensible to me.

    When you buy a skin, you’re buying an asset that you’ll see and use in your game. Sure, it’s just cosmetics, but it’s kinda usable cosmetics. If the game goes down, your skin is probably lost as well, but at least you had some fun with it.

    When you buy an nft, you buy your rights to a link to an image. It’s way more “protected” than simply buying a skin, in a similar way to how owning crypto works. Your right to that link is saved on a blockchain and you become the sole “owner” of that link. You could technically resell it (not sure if it’s allowed on Reddit though), but if a server hosting that image goes down, you’re left owning a broken link.

    And while there’s no other way to get an asset into a game other than to buy it (or mod the game), you could just save an image you like and use it as an avatar anyway, so you’re not even required to buy nfts to use those as an avatar/banner. It’s more of a trading service.

    That technology seems great for proving your rights to some documents or IDs, but it’s still weird to me that people decided to use NFTs for selling link rights to generated jpgs. You don’t even get the licence or usage rights to an image itself, it could be copyright-protected and owned by someone else.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    Hello fellow Vietnamese. Great to see you here.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›