95
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

imagine being the dorks that got put next to hitler lmao

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 48 points 2 years ago

Mother Teresa did not change anything. She positioned herself in some of the most impoverished areas of the world and told dying people how great their suffering was for their souls.

[-] [email protected] 31 points 2 years ago

don't forget all the anti-birth-control stuff! very cool!

[-] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

She also accepted money from and defended "Baby Doc" Duvalier and corrupt businessmen.

I think the Catholic Church just needed some kind of W after the allegations came out, and that's why she was propped up. What I don't understand is why in my non-Catholic country she was mentioned in school books as a great person.

[-] [email protected] 36 points 2 years ago

They put the guy who bathed his feet in the toilets at Atari and died trying to cure cancer with smoothies next to Einstein

[-] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago

one of the tech guru’s go-to stress relievers during the early days of Apple was to head to the company toilets and soak his bare feet in the toilet water. In fact, the guy had a little bit of a hygiene problem — Isaacson also revealed how Jobs was put on the night shift while he worked at game-maker Atari because he rarely bathed and would walk around the office in his bare feet

[-] [email protected] 14 points 2 years ago

okay so what are the mechanics of this? is he... sitting on the floor and then putting his feet up and over the rim of the toilet bowl? is he standing in the toilet? did he bring a chair into a stall?

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

maybe he's sitting on the tank? idk but this sounds so disgusting. Maybe his cancer came from chronic Hep C from doing this or something.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 15 points 2 years ago

the fact that you said "next to" instead of "below" made me cackle like a hyena when I scrolled up and saw Jesus

[-] [email protected] 36 points 2 years ago

POCs who changed the word: fought racism and imperialism

White people who changed the world: got rich and / or were Hitler

[-] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] [email protected] 27 points 2 years ago

Isn't Oprah just a TV star what is the argument for how she (or the Beatles) changed the world?

[-] [email protected] 42 points 2 years ago

Oprah was unbelievably influential in promoting quack medicine and psychology which gave mainstream legitimacy to frauds like Dr Oz and Dr Phil and more. She has undoubtedly played a role in the collective damaging of the American psyche

[-] [email protected] 22 points 2 years ago

she did give everybody a car tho so

[-] [email protected] 33 points 2 years ago

Another sin, no one should get cars

[-] [email protected] 24 points 2 years ago

yeah i find it funny how making popular media is portrayed here as basically being the same as jesus

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

Imaging sailing across the Atlantic to build a shitty town so you can practice your version of Oprahism away from the other Oprahites

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

sometimes bourgeois media are accidentally based

[-] [email protected] 24 points 2 years ago
[-] [email protected] 31 points 2 years ago

The fact that so many books still name the Beatles as "the greatest or most significant or most influential" rock band ever only tells you how far rock music still is from becoming a serious art. Jazz critics have long recognized that the greatest jazz musicians of all times are Duke Ellington and John Coltrane, who were not the most famous or richest or best sellers of their times, let alone of all times. Classical critics rank the highly controversial Beethoven over classical musicians who were highly popular in courts around Europe. Rock critics are still blinded by commercial success. The Beatles sold more than anyone else (not true, by the way), therefore they must have been the greatest. Jazz critics grow up listening to a lot of jazz music of the past, classical critics grow up listening to a lot of classical music of the past. Rock critics are often totally ignorant of the rock music of the past, they barely know the best sellers. No wonder they will think that the Beatles did anything worthy of being saved.

[-] [email protected] 27 points 2 years ago

It's just ossified boomer culture that has become the cosmic background of modern cracker culture

[-] [email protected] 14 points 2 years ago

The Beatles were the first band to accumulate a large, consumerist fanbase like we know of modern day examples ranging from Taylor Swift, to the niche bands. Their music is genuinely pretty good (Rubber Soul is their best album imo) and doesn't really sound too dated.

Lists of artists considered the best do often feature the Beatles at the very top, but that is both a regional preference geared towards the mostly American internet user-base and commercial film-making capacities and a circlejerk written to earn money, not inform. Other parts of the world might not care about music that's apparently well liked in Anglo countries, among music nerds or the public. Also, subjective quality does not guarantee the band being seen as better. For example, the band De/Vision is imo a better Depeche Mode copycat than Camouflage imo, but it's the latter who had commercial success.

Really, the greatest [x] artist rankings are kinda useless, especially in music - but I'm just rambling.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

Classical critics rank the highly controversial Beethoven over classical musicians who were highly popular in courts around Europe.

You can go further than that, as it has been pointed out that the canonicity of figures like Beethoven (who, to be clear, was a brilliant musician who deserves to be studied) was in large part due to the projects of historical-cultural revisionism by German nationalists and provides a warped understanding of the history of the development of music in Europe.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 21 points 2 years ago
[-] [email protected] 17 points 2 years ago

Bonus points for an ostensibly centrist MLK

[-] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago

oprah??? HITLER???????

[-] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago

people know im a good person when i put Hitler on the front of a "best people ever" book

[-] [email protected] 12 points 2 years ago

Don't forget..... the most important ones...... Satoshi Nakamoto & Vitalik Buterin 😤😤

[-] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago

many have described hitler as "the fifth beatle"

[-] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago

Don't they publish this every other year or something? I swear I've seen that title and cover forever.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago

the maoist uprising against the landlords was the largest and most comprehensive proletarian revolution in history, and led to almost totally-equal redistribution of land among the peasantry

[-] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

So, you can get the table of contents from the sample here:

https://frontrange.overdrive.com/frontrange-lafayette/content/media/6724435?cid=1160906

Gorbachev gets a spot but Stalin doesn't. They include Mao and Lenin. Under philosophers, they ignore obvious choices like Plato, Nietzsche, [Marx is relegated to "cultural icon"], and really anyone but Buddha, Confucius, and Aristotle for people who are conventionally seen in the west as "philosophers". Thank God they didn't waste a spot on Kant, had to make sure to include Billy Graham and Mother fucking Theresa! "But Graham was a Civil Rights activist!" This would maybe be a valid point if they had Malcolm X (let alone someone like Huey Newton), but they don't.

Also Mary Wollstonecraft gets put in "cultural icon" instead of "philosopher", which I find kind of odd, but Beauvoir doesn't appear anywhere either.

Furthermore, the list is extraordinarily American-centric, but that goes without saying. Who in their right fucking mind puts Obama on this list? Elvis? Dr. Seuss, maybe, but how in the world does P.T. Barnum qualify?

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

07 for actually looking into it. the cover made my skin crawl too much to investigate

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I remember the old edition from 90's, first three were Newton, Jesus and Muhammad. Hitler wasn't even included, only got the note that he should be pretty high but the change he brought was bad so fuck him.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2023
95 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15989 readers
2 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to [email protected]

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS